Mental health industry watchdog says psychiatric restraints need to be banned in the U.S. and worldwide as part of ending coercive psychiatric practices.
By CCHR International
The Mental Health Industry Watchdog
November 17, 2023
Updated: February 6, 2024
The Citizens Commission on Human Rights International, headquartered in Los Angeles, has written to every state legislator in the U.S. calling on them to ban the use of physical and chemical restraints and seclusion rooms in psychiatric and behavioral facilities, nursing homes and behavioral schools. A recent Los Angeles Times exposé on restraint use in California underscored the need for greater transparency and oversight of such coercive practices in psychiatric facilities. It highlighted how one psychiatric unit restrained patients at a rate more than 50 times higher than the national average for inpatient psychiatric facilities, ranking it among the highest in the country.[1]
Despite the compelling report, three months later, in February 2024, the Los Angeles Times reported that the facility it had earlier highlighted, the Los Angeles General Medical Center, which had restraint rates ranked among the highest in the country between 2118 and 2020, continued to restrain patients at alarming rates. The center has the fourth highest rate of any such inpatient unit in California, as per recent data. Indeed, L.A. General’s inpatient psychiatric unit, which is located at the Augustus F. Hawkins Mental Health Center in Willowbrook, had a restraint rate 48 times higher than the national average—higher than the notorious Belleview psychiatric hospital in New York. The latest figures from the federal government cover the year 2022.
In the aftermath of The Times’ investigation, two L.A. County supervisors publicly called for health officials to find alternatives to physically restraining Hawkins patients. However, the article, headlined “‘Scandalous’: L.A. General again among highest in U.S. in restraining psychiatric patients,” exemplifies the shocking level of adequate response by such facilities, indicating a lack of forceful accountability.[1A]
All manner of excuses are given for allowing coercive psychiatric practices to continue—including the usual cry that more funding is needed, which doesn’t change the underlying issue: that the treatment provided is a failure and often relies upon coercion and force. And this begets more brutal practices, such as restraints.
In 2024, a California proposition aims to allocate $6.4 billion in taxpayer funds to “drastically expand the state’s mental health and substance abuse treatment infrastructure. A majority of the money, $4.4 billion, would be used to build 10,000 in-patient and residential treatment beds across the state.”[1B]
After almost 20 years, the California “millionaires’” tax—1% of every 1 million in income sent straight to the mental health coffers—has brought in an estimated $26 billion, more than double of what lawmakers ever thought possible when they proposed the tax through legislation, the Mental Health Services Act. California is expecting a whopping $4.7 billion in Mental Health Services Act money for the 2023-24 fiscal year.[1C] Yet, the state and the psychiatrists overseeing treatment in the state still rely heavily on such abhorrent practices as chemical and physical restraint.
CCHR says this is common across the U.S., and the shocking level of punitive, abusive, and coercive practices is an indictment of the failure of a mental health system that spends $280 billion a year.
The call for a ban on restraint use and all coercive psychiatric practices was reiterated in light of a World Health Organization guideline for legislators issued on October 9th regarding “Mental Health, Human Rights and Legislation.” This calls on governments to prohibit restraints and seclusion room use. It states: “There is a growing consensus that all forms of restraint and seclusion in mental health services should be eliminated…. Not only are seclusion and restraint contrary to international human rights law, their use is incompatible with a recovery approach” and “can lead to physical and psychological harm, even death.” As such, legislation should “prohibit the use of seclusion and restraint in any health or social care facility.”[2]
The U.S. has ratified as domestic law the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Since at least 2013, the Committee Against Torture has recommended an end to the use of restraint and solitary confinement, for both long- and short-term application in mental health settings.[3] In 2021, another WHO guideline on mental health recommended prohibiting coercive psychiatric practices, including restraints, as they constitute an act of torture.[4] However, the U.S. has allowed lethal restraint practices to continue.
This is despite even the World Psychiatric Association in October 2020 ceding that practices that constitute coercion, include, “treatment without consent (or ‘compulsory treatment’), any form of treatment including the use of psychotropic medication; seclusion, locking or confining a person to a space or room alone; restraint actions aimed at controlling a person’s physical movement, including prolonged or unsafe holding by other person(s), the use of any physical devices (‘mechanical restraint’, chaining etc.) and the use of psychotropic drugs for the primary purpose of controlling movement (‘chemical restraint’).”
WPA warned that the use of coercive practices “carries the risk of harmful consequences, including trauma” and “individuals subject to physical coercion are susceptible to harms that include physical pain, injury and death.”[5]
Tracking restraint use in the U.S. is difficult because there is variability in physical restraint reporting and coding practices between hospitals nationally.[6] The LA Times resorted to filing Freedom of Information Act requests to obtain government statistics, as CCHR has also been forced to do to obtain data on coercive treatment use throughout the nation.
Lack of effective oversight means that often restraint deaths are only known about through media reports. There have been several high-profile teen restraint deaths in recent years where coroners have determined their deaths to be homicide. Two deaths involved African-American children, one aged 16 and the other, 7.
According to a national review of restraint-related deaths of children and adults with disabilities, African Americans are over-represented, accounting for 22% of the examined cases, despite comprising only 13% of the overall U.S. population.[7]
Media reports reveal that mental health patients in New York spent a total of nearly 11,900 hours in restraints and 9,000 hours in seclusion while in psychiatric units in 2021, according to the latest federal data. Men and women were handcuffed, hit with batons, drugged and left strapped to beds for up to 12 hours without regular check-ups and water, the USA TODAY Network reported.[8]
An astounding number of schools also resort to the use of restraints and seclusion rooms in a psychiatric culture today that drugs children’s behavior to be compliant and can drive them to suicide or acts of violence.[9] In October 2022, CT Insider reported, “Every day in public and private schools across the country, children are ‘restrained’ – physically held by staff members, pinned to the ground, or bound by mechanical devices such as straps or handcuffs. Other times, students are kept in ‘seclusion,’ confined alone in rooms ranging from windowless small supply closets and bathrooms to spaces resembling padded cells.” As a result, “Children are traumatized, injured, even die.” Students as young as 3 or 4 have been restrained or secluded.[10]
The coercive practice is also prevalent in nursing homes. According to one law firm, a staggering 38% of senior patients in nursing homes experience being physically restrained at least once every day.[11]
The Nursing Home Abuse Guide points out that “research continues to show that physical restraints are not safe and do not decrease the risk of injury. These methods can be extremely harmful to patients, and can increase both physical and emotional suffering.” Further, “The loss of freedom of movement has serious emotional consequences as well. Restrained patients often experience agitation, depression, and loss of dignity and self-respect.”[12]
Federal law prohibits staff members from using physical restraint on nursing home residents except in emergency situations.[13] However, what constitutes an “emergency” is open to subjective opinion. Under the Code of Federal Regulations, hospitals participating in Medicare, including those with rehabilitation or psychiatric units, must report deaths associated with the use of restraint and/or seclusion directly to the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services.[14]
CCHR says this does not go far enough and across the board, legislative protections are needed prohibiting chemical and physical restraint and punitive seclusion rooms, not only in the U.S. but globally.
[1] Ben Poston, Emily Alpert Reyes, “Strapped down: Psychiatric patients are restrained at sky-high rates at this L.A. hospital,” Los Angeles Times, 19 Oct. 2023, https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-10-19/psychiatric-patients-restraint-high-rate-california-los-angeles-general-hospital
[1A] “‘Scandalous’: L.A. General again among highest in U.S. in restraining psychiatric patients,” Los Angeles Times, 3 Jan. 2024, https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-02-03/los-angeles-general-medical-center-hospital-restraints-psychiatric-patients
[1B] https://calmatters.org/california-voter-guide-2024/prop-1-mental-health/
[1C] https://news.yahoo.com/california-billions-spend-mental-health-100024089.html
[2] World Health Organization, OHCHR, “Guidance on Mental Health, Human Rights and Legislation,” 9 Oct. 2023, p. 72
[3] “Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Juan E. Méndez,” UN Human Rights Council, 1 Feb. 2013, point 32, http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session22/A.HRC.22.53_English.pdf
[4] https://www.cchrint.org/2021/06/11/world-health-organization-new-guidelines-are-vital-to-end-coercive-psychiatric-practices-abuse/ citing Guidance on Community Mental Health Services: Promoting Person-Centered and Rights-Based Approaches,” World Health Organization, 10 June 2021, p. 6, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707 (to download report)
[5] https://www.cchrint.org/2021/06/07/un-special-rapporteur-dainius-puras-addresses-psychiatrys-global-coercion-crisis/ citing https://www.wpanet.org/alternatives-to-coercion
[6] https://ldi.upenn.edu/our-work/research-updates/how-patient-restraints-are-being-used-in-a-childrens-hospital/
[7] https://www.cchrint.org/2020/06/09/naacp-inglewood-south-bay-executive-and-cchr-calls-for-ban-on-restraints-in-psychiatric-hospitals/ citing: https://www.equipforequality.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/National-Review-of-Restraint-Related-Deaths-of-Adults-and-Children-with-Disabilities-The-Lethal-Consequences-of-Restraint.pdf
[8] David Robinson, “As NY pushes mental health plan, 13 hospitals use restraints above average….,” Democrat & Chronicle, 7 Feb. 2023,
[9] https://undivided.io/resources/restraint-and-seclusion-1383; https://www.npr.org/2019/06/15/729955321/how-some-schools-restrain-or-seclude-students-a-look-at-a-controversial-practice; https://www.cchrint.org/2018/02/20/school-shootings-mental-health-watchdog-says-psychotropic-drug-use-by-school-shooters-merits-federal-investigation/; https://www.cchrint.org/school-shooters/
[10] “Controversial and often used, these little-known practices cause harm, even death, among U.S. schoolchildren,” CT Insider, 27 Oct. 2022, https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/Controversial-and-often-used-these-little-known-17474949.php
[11] https://www.californianursinghomeabuselawyer-blog.com/category/restraints/
[12] https://www.nursinghomeabuseguide.org/physical-restraints/
[13] https://resultsyoudeserve.com/blog/the-use-of-restraints-in-nursing-homes/
SHARE YOUR STORY/COMMENT