Posts Tagged ‘binge eating’

Hoarding, skin picking and temper tantrums are now classified as mental disorders in controversial revision of ‘psychiatric bible’

Friday, April 12th, 2013

Daily Mail
By Sadie Whitelocks
April 12, 2013

People who hoard, pick their skin, binge eat or throw temper tantrums will soon be classed as having a serious mental illness.

The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), to be released on May 22, includes an extended list of psychological behaviors.

But the decision to categorize seemingly benign habits as full-fledged disorders has divided opinion, and many believe it just extends the ‘reach of psychiatry further into daily life.’

Advocates say it will lead to more accessible treatment and greater understanding of the conditions, but others argue it will add to America’s growing prescription drug abuse problem.

Gary Greenberg, author of The Book of Woe: The DSM and the Unmaking of Psychiatry, writes in The New Yorker: ‘Every revision of the DSM causes controversy; that’s what happens when experts argue in public about the nature of human suffering.

‘But never has the process provoked warfare so brutal, with attacks coming from within the profession as well from psychiatry’s usual opponents.’

Some critics have suggested that the new guidelines will make mental illness more common. For instance, according to the DSM-5 those who eat to excess 12 times in three months will be a candidate for binge eating disorder.

The Daily Beast jokingly writes: ‘[This] makes us think twice about the last time we devoured a pizza pie (last week) or ate three doughnuts in one sitting (this morning).’

And prominent names in the psychiatric profession have highlighted the serious consequences of the revisions.

Duke University psychiatrist Allen J. Frances, who was tasked with putting together the fourth edition of the DSM published in 1994, but did not work on the updated handbook, expressed concern over the changes.

‘A new diagnosis can be more dangerous than a new drug,’ he told The Daily Beast.

He said the new diagnosis of ‘disruptive mood dysregulation disorder’(DMDD) – a term used to describe children’s temper tantrums combined with mood swings – is one of the most worrying entries.

And clinical social worker Joe Wegmann said it was based on ‘no credible research’ and would trigger an ‘zealous binge’ of over-diagnosis.

However those in favor of DMDD hope it will have the opposite effect, and reduce misdiagnoses of childhood bipolar disorder and subsequent over-treatment.

Hoarding has long been considered a symptom or subtype of obsessive compulsive disorder and affects an estimated 4 million people in the U.S.

But as of May it will get its own clinical definition.

In the DSM-5 it is defined as a ‘persistent difficulty discarding or parting with possessions, regardless of their actual value’ and the harmful emotional, social, and financial impacts both on the hoarder and the hoarder’s family members are highlighted.

Another new criterion under obsessive-compulsive related disorders is skin-picking.

This applies to those who consistently pick blemishes, pimples or scabs and ‘do extensive damage’ to their body as a result.

A new section on areas that ‘need further research’ has also been incorporated into the DSM-5.

This means that conditions including sex addiction and internet overuse require additional research before they can be incorporated into the official diagnoses.

The DSM-5 has been 11 years in the making and was written and published by the American Psychiatric Association.

The first edition of the DSM - widely considered the ‘bible of psychiatry’ – was published in 1952 and today it influences practitioners around the world.

« Return to news items


Share

The BBC—new report challenges psychiatry’s billing bible, the DSM—”Mental Health: Are we all sick now?”

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

BBC News
By Philippa Roxby
July 28, 2010

Diagnosing psychiatric illness has always been controversial, mental health experts say. Now some are worried that a new draft of the diagnostic ‘bible’ for mental health medicine could result in almost everyone being diagnosed with a mental condition.

The diagnostic ‘bible’ in question is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, published by the American Psychiatric Association.

The US manual is used worldwide as a basis for diagnosis, research and medical education.

Its forthcoming fifth edition – known in the profession as as DSM-5 – is set to contain a range of new diagnoses, including conditions such as “mixed anxiety depression, psychosis risk syndrome and temper dysregulation disorder”, as well as the more mundane binge eating.

The danger, say experts writing in a special issue of the Journal of Mental Health, is that there has not been enough research to back up these changes.

Even the smallest shift in how to define something like depression could have huge implications.

Self-fulfilling

Dr Felicity Callard, senior research fellow at the Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, says it is crucial to understand what happens when people are over-diagnosed.

“There are very big potential implications on how people, particularly adolescents, respond to being told they have a mental illness. It’s likely there will be harmful consequences,” she said.

She cites the “at risk psychosis syndrome” diagnosis as an example of a label which is given to young people who ‘might’ have psychosis – characterised by abrupt changes in personality. It is a diagnosis of something which could result in a disorder, but only potentially. That can have complicated effects, she says.

“Imagine a young person being told that they are “at risk” of developing a mental illness. How would that affect that individual’s behaviour? Could it lead to increased stigma or even discrimination? And how might it affect the parents and family of that person too?”

Jerome Wakefield of New York University’s Department of Psychiatry writes: “One of the most frightening scenarios is the potential for medicating people – particularly children – who haven’t yet shown any signs of illness in a bid to ‘treat’ them.”

These concerns are shared by a number of clinical experts in the Journal of Mental Health.

Read entire article here:  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-10787342

« Return to news items


Share

Former Head of Psychiatric Billing Bible—Theres no lab test, X-ray or any test that can prove someone has a mental disorder

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010

Normality is an endangered species.

Psychology Today
By Allen Frances, Former Chairman, DSM-IV Task Force
June 2, 2010

Fads in psychiatric diagnosis come and go and have been with us as long as there has been a psychiatry. The fads meet a deeply felt need to explain, or at least to label, what would otherwise be unexplainable human suffering and deviance. In recent years the pace has picked up and false “epidemics” have come in bunches involving an ever increasing proportion of the population. We are now in the midst of at least three such epidemics- of autism, attention deficit, and childhood bipolar disorder.  And unless it comes to its senses, DSM5 threatens to provoke several more  (hypersexuality, binge eating, mixed anxiety depression, minor neurocognitive, and others).

Fads punctuate what has become a basic background of overdiagnosis. Normality is an endangered species. The NIMH estimates that, in any given year, twenty five percent of the population (that’s almost sixty million people) has a diagnosable mental disorder. A prospective study found that, by age thirty two, fifty percent of the general population had qualified for an anxiety disorder, forty percent for a depression, and thirty percent for alcohol abuse or dependence. Imagine what the rates will be like by the time these people hit fifty, or sixty five, or eighty.  In this brave new world of psychiatric overdiagnosis, will anyone get through life without a mental disorder?

What accounts for the recent upsurge in diagnosis? I feel quite confident we can’t blame it on our brains. Human physiology and human nature change slowly if at all.  Could it be that the surge in mental disorders is caused by our stressful society? I think not.  There is no particular reason to believe that life is any harder now than it has always been-more likely we are the most pampered and protected generation  ever to face its inevitable challenges. It is also tempting to find environmental (eg toxins) or iatrogenic causes(eg vaccinations), but there is no credible evidence supporting either of these. There is really only one viable environmental candidate to explain the growth of mental disorder – the widespread recreational use of psychotropic substances.  But this cannot account for the extent of the “epidemics”, particularly since most have centered on children.

No. The “epidemics” in psychiatry are caused by changing diagnostic fashions – the  people don’t change, the labels do. There are no objective tests in psychiatry-no X-ray, laboratory, or exam finding that says definitively that someone does or does not have a mental disorder.  What is diagnosed as mental disorder is very sensitive to professional and social contextual forces. Rates of disorder rise easily  because mental disorder has such fluid boundaries with normality.

Read entire article:  http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/dsm5-in-distress/201006/psychiatric-fads-and-overdiagnosis

« Return to news items


Share

Natural News: Children’s temper tantrums to be reclassified as mental disorders

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

Natural News
By Ethan A. Huff
May 11, 2010

Proposed changes to the U.S. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) could include reclassifying childhood temper tantrums, teenage angst, and binge eating as psychiatric disorders. If accepted, the proposals could equal billions of dollars in new revenue for pharmaceutical companies.

The DSM is often referred to as the “bible” of the psychiatric profession. The handbook exerts significant influence on the American healthcare system, affecting everything from insurance companies and medical providers to universities and prisons. Even the legal system lends credence to its provisions.

It is precisely because of its wide scope of influence that many condemn the DSM. The manual is known for categorizing character traits and emotions as mental conditions for which medical treatment, typically drugs with highly dangerous side effects, is advised.

According to Christopher Lane, author of a 2007 critique of DSM called Shyness: How Normal Behavior Became a Sickness and professor at Northwestern University, responded to the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) proposal by saying, “The organization is clearly opening another Pandora’s box here, as well as paving the way for the medication of even greater numbers of children and teenagers cycling through emotional stages as part of normal development.”

He is right, considering the fact that if binge eating is reclassified as a psychiatric disorder, millions of Americans could instantly be declared as mentally ill. Though provisions would be included to exclude those who merely overeat, the ramifications of associating eating disorders with mental illness at all would likely include a massive increase in the number of people taking psychotropic drugs.

Read entire article:  http://www.naturalnews.com/028762_children_disorders.html

« Return to news items


Share

The Daily Mail “Psychiatrists want to call being angry a mental illness. How utterly mad!”

Monday, February 15th, 2010

The Daily Mail
By Jerome Burne
February 15, 2010

Do you live surrounded by clutter – ancient copies of magazines, your children’s old toys, articles you’ve clipped out of newspapers over the years?

If you find it hard to throw out things of limited or no value, you could be suffering from hoarding disorder.

‘Hoarding’ is just one of the new mental conditions being added to the psychiatrists’ bible, or the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders (DSM), to give it its proper name.

Other new conditions identified as possibly needing professional help include binge eating – which is said to affect many people who are seriously obese – and ‘cognitive tempo disorder’, which seems very like laziness (symptoms include dreaminess and sluggishness).

There’s also ‘intermittent explosive disorder’, which involves occasionally becoming very angry suddenly.

Most bizarre of the proposed additions is one defined as ‘getting a thrill at being outraged by pornography’.

It was also described as Whitehouse syndrome after the campaigner Mary Whitehouse, who objected to sexual content on TV.

The DSM is a large book that lists all psychiatric disorders and describes their symptoms. If a condition is in there, it means it’s considered a mental illness.

But some of the new entries are controversial, not least because of fears they will result in many more people being put on drugs that could be ineffective or dangerous.

Read entire article:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1251309/Psychiatrists-want-angry-mental-illness-How-utterly-mad.html

« Return to news items


Share

Psychiatrists want ‘binge eating’ as official mental disorder-millions of overweight Americans could be profitable target

Sunday, November 22nd, 2009

Melissa Healy
Los Angeles Times
November 23, 2009

Rina Silverman’s refrigerator is almost always empty. She keeps it that way to avert episodes of frantic food consumption, often at night after a full meal, in which she tastes nothing and feels nothing but can polish off a party-sized bag of chips or a container of ice cream, maybe a whole box of cereal. The food she’s eating at these moments hardly matters.

In short order, the nothing that Silverman feels and tastes will give way to nauseating fullness, and a bitter backwash of guilt, shame and self-reproach.

The fullness, in time, passes. But the corrosive shame and self-reproach are always there.

Silverman, a 43-year-old executive assistant from Sherman Oaks, is one of the 145 million Americans who are overweight or obese. But the frenzies of consumption put her in a far smaller category of Americans, not all of whom are even overweight.

Silverman is a binge eater, one who is slowly inching her way toward recovery. She and as many as 1 in 30 Americans — roughly 7.3 million adults — are at the center of a psychiatric debate over whether and how to recognize binge eating as a mental disorder.

Read entire article: http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-he-binge23-2009nov23,0,2869829.story

« Return to news items


Share