Posts Tagged ‘Johnson & Johnson’

Johnson & Johnson Internal Documents Reveal Unsavory & Potentially Illegal Marketing of Antipsychotic drug Risperdal

Friday, March 12th, 2010

InjuryBoard.com
By Jim Lewis
March 12, 2010

The multi-billion dollar drug company, Johnson & Johnson (J&J), has come under fire for allegedly violating the rules in their marketing of Risperdal, an antipsychotic drug. Back in 1999, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) told J&J that their marketing materials for geriatric patients overstated Risperdals benefits and minimized risks, according to Bloomberg.com. In 2000, an internal business plan strategized a way to increase Risperdals market share by marketing the benefits for elderly dementia, an unapproved use.

This was described as one of the more egregious examples of marketing drugs to vulnerable patients by Jerry Avorn, who works at the Harvard Medical School. He went on to say, seeing such clear evidence in black and white of the details of a campaign like this is still pretty upsetting.

J&Js marketing of Risperdal could be illegal since current law states that drug companies cannot promote a drug for uses other than those approved by the FDA. At the time this marketing and business plan was crafted, Risperdal was only approved for psychotic disorders like schizophrenia, not for dementia.

Read entire article:  http://virginiabeach.injuryboard.com/fda-and-prescription-drugs/johnson-johnson-internal-documents-reveal-unsavory-and-potentially-illegal-marketing-of-risperdal.aspx?googleid=279316

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark

Massachusetts joins federal lawsuit accusing Johnson & Johnson of paying kickbacks to push their antipsychotic drug

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

Fierce Pharma
By Tracy Staton
March 11, 2010

The Massachusetts attorney general joined that federal lawsuit accusing Johnson & Johnson of paying kickbacks to push the antipsychotic Risperdal and other drugs into nursing homes. AG Martha Coakley didn’t stop there; however, her office is also investigating other companies that market antipsychotics to nursing homes in the state.

At issue is whether drug companies are touting antipsychotic drugs for unapproved uses, such as dementia. The FDA has warned that use of the atypical antipsychotics in elderly dementia patients can increase the risk of death. “The inappropriate off-label marketing of antipsychotic drugs to nursing homes is a significant health and safety issue for our seniors,” Coakley says in a statement released by her office (as quoted by the Boston Globe). “We have taken strong action on this issue in the past and are continuing to monitor it very closely moving forward.”

Read entire article:  http://www.fiercepharma.com/story/massachusetts-joins-kickback-suit-against-j-j/2010-03-11

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark

Internal documents show drug company marketed their antipsychotic Risperdal for unapproved usage on elderly & kids

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

Bloomberg.com
By Margaret Cronin Fisk, Jef Feeley and David Voreacos
March 10, 2010

Johnson & Johnson made plans to reach $302 million in geriatric sales for its antipsychotic Risperdal just months after federal regulators said the company falsely claimed the drug was safe and effective with the elderly, according to internal documents.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration told J&J in 1999 that its marketing materials for geriatric patients overstated Risperdal’s benefits and minimized risks. A J&J business plan for the next year called for increasing the drug’s market share for elderly dementia sales, an unapproved use, according to newly unsealed documents in a lawsuit by the state of Louisiana.

“The geriatric market represents Risperdal’s second wave of growth,” J&J officials wrote in the business plan. “The aging population will continue to drive market growth well into the next century.”

Louisiana officials cited the document and dozens of other internal J&J files in its lawsuit claiming the company marketed Risperdal to the elderly and children for unapproved uses. Professor Jerry Avorn of Harvard Medical School, who isn’t involved in the case, called the papers “one of the more egregious examples” of marketing drugs to vulnerable patients.

“By 2010, most grownups in medicine know that drug companies resort to unsavory practices to promote drugs, but seeing such clear evidence in black and white of the details of a campaign like this is still pretty upsetting,” Avorn said.

Read entire article:  http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=ag4Ya8UOIob0&pos=13

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark

Kickbackers’ motto: ‘Do no harm’ (to profits)—How drug company used kickbacks to get patients on psych drugs

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

Boston Globe
By Donald A. MacGillis
January 26, 2010

TALK ABOUT death panels. The US attorney in Boston recently filed suit against the world’s largest maker of health products, Johnson & Johnson, for using kickbacks to get more nursing home patients onto its drugs, including one that was later found to be so lethal to the elderly it had to carry a black-box warning. The government’s complaint leaves little doubt that the drug company acted in a predatory way to increase sales and market share for its products, especially Risperdal, an antipsychotic often used to keep Alzheimer’s and dementia patients under control.

Risperdal is used principally for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Doping the elderly into placidity is an off-label use of the drug, one that the Food and Drug Administration finally cautioned against in 2005. The reason for the black box warning the FDA required? Too many of the elderly who got the drug were dying.

There is one other reason to thank the federal government for going after the suspect payments Johnson & Johnson made to the middleman to juice up sales of its drugs: Since Medicaid covers most of the nursing home patients, the taxpayer ends up paying much of the bill.

The middleman between Johnson & Johnson and the nursing homes is Omnicare, the country’s largest pharmacy for nursing homes. Last November, it agreed, without “any finding of wrongdoing’’ or “any admission of liability,’’ to a $98 million settlement with the government for its role in helping Johnson & Johnson boost sales to nursing homes. The government says that between 1999 and 2004 Omnicare received tens of millions of dollars in the form of escalating rebates based on greater market share for Johnson & Johnson drugs and in payments ostensibly made by Johnson & Johnson for “data’’ from Omnicare, much of which Omnicare never provided. Other kickbacks, the government says, came in the form of “grants’’ and “educational funding.’’

Read entire article:  http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2010/01/26/kickbackers_motto_do_no_harm_to_profits/

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark

Drugmaker that got kickbacks for giving antipsychotics to nursing home patients deserves “a special place in hell”

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

Baltimore Chronicle & Sentinel
By James Ridgeway
January 17, 2010

There really should be a special place in hell for pharmaceutical manufacturers who make money by exploiting the weakest and most vulnerable of patients: old people with dementia. I wrote about one such case back in April of last year:

Pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly recently agreed to pay a record $1.4 billion dollars to settle charges that it illegally marketed the anti-psychotic drug Zyprexa as a treatment for Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia in elderly patients. This despite the fact that the drug was not only unapproved for this “off-label” use, but had also been shown to cause obesity and diabetes.

Now, $1.4 billion might sound like a tough punishment, until you find out that Lilly’s total sales of Zyprexa have topped $37 billion. And at least some of those sales were thanks to doctors who, with guidance from Lilly drug reps, wrote thousands of prescriptions for patients with virtually no ability to defend themselves.

The steep fine against Lilly apparently didn’t discourage another drugmaker, Johnson & Johnson, from using even sleazier tactics to promote its own lucrative antipsychotic for use on nursing home residents. As the New York Times reported on Friday:

Johnson & Johnson paid kickbacks to the nation’s largest nursing home pharmacy to increase the number of elderly patients taking the antipsychotic Risperdal and several other medications, according to a complaint filed Friday by the office of the United States attorney in Boston.

Read entire article:  http://baltimorechronicle.com/2010/011810Ridgeway.shtml

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark

Feds say Johnson & Johnson paid millions in kickbacks to increase drug sales including the antipsychotic Risperdal

Friday, January 15th, 2010

Wall Street Journal
By Jonathan D. Rockoff
January 15, 2010

Federal prosecutors alleged that Johnson & Johnson paid one of the nation’s largest pharmacies serving nursing homes “tens of millions of dollars in kickbacks” to increase sales of drugs including blockbuster antipsychotic Risperdal.

Prosecutors charged in a complaint filed in federal court in Boston Friday that J&J illegally paid Omnicare Inc. to get the pharmacy company to buy J&J medicines and recommend their use to nursing homes. Omnicare’s yearly purchases of J&J products nearly tripled to $280 million, prosecutors alleged.

The alleged payments took place from 1999 to 2004 and took various forms, including payments for the pharmacy’s data and for education programs for customers, prosecutors said. Omnicare charged Medicaid for a “substantial portion,” they said.

Read entire article:  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703657604575004902853166786.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_sections_business

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark

US Kids Represent Psychiatric Drug Goldmine

Monday, December 14th, 2009

Truthout
Evelyn Pringle
December 12, 2009

Prescriptions for psychiatric drugs increased 50 percent with children in the US, and 73 percent among adults, from 1996 to 2006, according to a study in the May/June 2009 issue of the journal Health Affairs. Another study in the same issue of Health Affairs found spending for mental health care grew more than 30 percent over the same ten-year period, with almost all of the increase due to psychiatric drug costs.

On April 22, 2009, the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reported that in 2006 more money was spent on treating mental disorders in children aged 0 to 17 than for any other medical condition, with a total of $8.9 billion. By comparison, the cost of treating trauma-related disorders, including fractures, sprains, burns, and other physical injuries, was only $6.1 billion.

In 2008, psychiatric drug makers had overall sales in the US of $14.6 billion from antipsychotics, $9.6 billion off antidepressants, $11.3 billion from antiseizure drugs and $4.8 billion in sales of ADHD drugs, for a grand total of $40.3 billion.

The path to child drugging in the US started with providing adolescents with stimulants for ADHD in the early 80s. That was followed by Prozac in the late 80s, and in the mid-90s drug companies started claiming that ADHD kids really had bipolar disorder, coinciding with the marketing of epilepsy drugs as “mood stablizers” and the arrival of the new atypical antipsychotics.

Read entire article: http://www.truthout.org/1213091

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark

Just sickening: Cartoon drug brochures given to kids for antipsychotics (psychiatry’s most dangerous drugs)

Friday, November 20th, 2009

Jim Edwards
BNET
November 20, 1009

Britain’s National Health Service is losing a fight against the Bonkers Institute for Nearly Genuine Research — a web site that publicizes the underbelly of psychiatric medicine — over brochures for children that tell them how to take antipsychotic medicines such as Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)’s Risperdal (risperidone).

The Bonkers Institute added three leaflets — for risperidone, atomoxetine and olanzapine — to its gallery of advertising for kids’ mental health medicines. The NHS has asked the web site to take them down as they are intended for patients only.

The brochures say things such as:

Why am I taking risperidone?     It can help if you are having thoughts that leave you feeling frightened or confused, or if you are hearing upsetting or annoying voices when nobody is there. It can also help if you are worried or frightened, or confused, and if you are finding it hard to concentrate on doing normal everyday tasks.

Risperidone is not approved for children in the U.S., and its off-label use in kids is controversial.

Read entire article: http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10005419/nhs-loses-fight-over-publication-of-antipsychotic-meds-brochures-for-kids/

See more cartoon kiddie drug promo for kids in Britain: http://www.bonkersinstitute.org/medshow/atomoxeteen.html

http://www.bonkersinstitute.org/medshow/risperrydone.html

http://www.bonkersinstitute.org/medshow/olanzapeen.html

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark

$112 million settlement: charged with kickbacks from drug company & recommending docs prescribe antipsychotic drug Risperdal

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

Reuters
November 3, 2009

Omnicare Inc, the largest U.S. provider of pharmacy services to nursing homes, will pay $98 million and Teva subsidiary IVAX Pharmaceuticals will pay $14 million to settle allegations of kickbacks, the U.S. Department of Justice said on Tuesday.

The department said Omnicare both solicited and paid kickbacks.

Omnicare allegedly asked IVAX to pay $8 million in exchange for agreeing to purchase $50 million in IVAX drugs, the DOJ said.

It also accused Omnicare of soliciting kickbacks from Johnson & Johnson in exchange for recommending that physicians prescribe the antipsychotic drug Risperdal to nursing home patients.

“J&J’s kickbacks to Omnicare took multiple forms, including rebates that were conditioned on Omnicare engaging in an ‘Active Intervention Program’ for Risperdal and payments disguised as data purchase fees, educational grants, and fees to attend Omnicare meetings,” the Justice Department said.

Read entire article: http://www.reuters.com/article/healthcareSector/idUSN0350746820091103

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark

Psych journal “looks into” whether psychiatrist who endorsed antidepressants for preschoolers was getting Pharma $$

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

Jim Edwards
bnet.com
September 10, 2009

The journal Archives of General Psychiatry will “look into” whether an author who recommended antidepressants for preschoolers failed to disclose her financial ties to Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca and, companies which make such drugs, according to Philip Dawdy of Furious Seasons.

Dr. Joan Luby,  a professor of child psychiatry at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, has authored several papers asserting that children as young as three years old can suffer from depression and bipolar disorder, and that treatment with antidepressants and antipsychotics may be appropriate. In a recent paper of the AGP, she wrote:

Preschool depression, similar to childhood depression, is not a developmentally transient syndrome but rather shows chronicity and/or recurrence.

She did not disclose any ties to industry. However, Luby has past ties to J&J’s Janssen unit, AZ and Shire (makers of Risperdal, Seroquel and Adderall XR, respectively).

Read entire article: http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10004189/agp-to-probe-undisclosed-industry-ties-of-doc-who-recommends-antidepressants-for-3-year-olds/

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark