Posts Tagged ‘Concerta’

Confidential report reveals: Big Pharma trying to stop long-term safety studies of ADHD drugs

Friday, March 5th, 2010

TransWorldNews
By Janne Larsson
March 5, 2010

The companies producing methylphenidate products (like Ritalin and Concerta) are normally competitors, marketing ADHD as a disease and the narcotic drugs as its solution. But when they are threatened with marketing restrictions they have a common interest.

If more scientific long-term studies would be done showing the harmful effects of the drugs it could lead to withdrawal from the market of this class of drugs. Therefore Big Pharma has to stop all such studies not written and controlled by themselves. The only studies they support are those conducted by paid researchers like psychiatry professors Joseph Biederman, Timothy Wilens and Thomas Spencer, where the outcome is known already from the beginning.

The European Commission has 27 May 2009, after a long review by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA), decided to issue warnings about methylphenidate drugs. The Commission has also decided that a number of long-term studies of good quality should be done to investigate different harmful effects of these drugs.

So for example the manufacturers were ordered to submit data how they could do long-term studies of psychiatric adverse effects (e.g. depression, hostility and psychotic reactions) and of cognitive effects (effects on learning, intellectual function) of the drugs. The answer from the pharmaceutical companies was a confidential report Feasibility Assessment of a Study of Long-term Effects of Methylphenidate on Cognition and Psychiatric Outcomes written 30 October 2009 – now made public by a Swedish court.

Read entire article:  http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?StoryID=244733

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark

UN Children’s Rights Committee Has “Serious Concerns” About Kids Being Drugged With Ritalin & Other Psychostimulants

Friday, February 12th, 2010

By CCHR Int
February 12, 2010

On January 29, 2010, the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) issued a formal statement that it is “seriously concerned about studies that indicate the rapid increase within a short period of time of the prescription of psycho-stimulants such as Ritalin and Concerta to children diagnosed with ADHD.”[1]

The Committee met in Geneva to review Norway’s implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and was responding to the 10-fold increase in psychostimulants prescribed children in the country between 1991 and 2003 and a further 70% since 2004.  Big Pharma has been reaping the profits from this—sales of psychostimulants increased more than 4,000% during the last decade. It was the third Nordic country the Committee had investigated for its psychiatric drugging of children.

Norwegian government delegates, including the Minister of Children, Audun Lyskbakken, and representatives of the Department of Health were strongly questioned about the potential abuse of children with powerful stimulants.  In a twitter message from the hearing the Norway’s Ombudsman for children said Minister Lyskbakken was questioned about the soaring Ritalin usage and whether children’s diets may be the source of “ADHD” symptoms resulting in prescriptions for stimulants. The Minister conceded, “There is room for improvement.”[2] The Norwegian Minister of Children also told the hearing that two studies are being conducted to establish the effectiveness of Omega 3 oils on the symptoms of “ADHD” and that medication should only be a last resort.

This is a step in the right direction of cocaine-like stimulants (that can cause psychosis, heart attacks and strokes) being prohibited for use in children, especially when there are safe non-drug alternatives.

Media reports on the CRC hearing and recommendations noted that expert testimony discussed evidence that diet is linked to behavior problems and questioned how Norway’s schools were tackling this. [3]

The CRC recommended that the government “carefully examine” the “phenomenon of over-prescription of psycho-stimulants to children” and to take initiatives to provide children with a greater range of educational and treatment options.

In 2005, the CRC completed a review of the implementation of human rights standards for children and issued a strong warning then to the governments that so-called ADHD and ADD are being misdiagnosed and that psychostimulant drugs are being over-prescribed, despite growing evidence of the harmful effects of these drugs.[4]


[1] UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Committee on the Rights of the Child, “Main areas of concern and recommendations; Basic health and welfare, points 42 & 43.) 29 Jan, 2010.

[2] http://www.morsmal.org/cgi-bin/index.cgi?action=viewnews&id=1460

[3] United Nations, Committee on Rights of Child Examines Report of Norway, 21 Jan. 2010.

[4] “Considerations of reports under article 44 of the convention—Concluding observations: Finland,” UN Committee of the Rights of the Child, CRC/C/15/Add.272, 20 Oct. 2005, p. 7; “Considerations of reports under article 44 of the convention—Concluding observations: Denmark,” UN Committee of the Rights of the Child, CRC/C/DNK/CO/3, 25 Nov. 2005, p. 8.

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark

Pharma’s Drug Ads: From Million Dollar TV Ads to $1.7 Billion Internet Marketing Campaign

Monday, November 16th, 2009

On November 13th, 2009, Pharmaceutical companies flocked to a two-day FDA hearing into online drug advertising, which could influence their use of social media on the net. 1  Already, the explosive growth in online advertising has intensified public concerns: the pharmaceutical industry spent more than $1 billion on Internet ads last year and is projected to spend $1.7 billion on such marketing efforts in 2012, according to the Direct Marketing Association.2

Both Eli Lilly and Merck have received warning letters this year from the FDA accusing them of misleading online advertisements.3  But while the FDA scrambles to monitor online ads, who monitors the psychiatric-pharmaceutical industry’s use of front groups to indirectly market their products?

A Washington Post article of June 16, 2009 reported that an increasing number of pharmaceutical firms are turning to social media tools, such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and MySpace, to market their products.  It cites how a community site sponsored by drugmaker McNeil called “ADHD Allies”—aimed at adults with ADHD—was established and offered an online podcast on financial advice and an “ADHD self-assessment tool.”4

British psychiatrist Joanne Moncrieff explains how this ultimately increases drug sales because only a biomedical approach is promoted: “Drug companies…provide funds for pro drug patient and carer groups and address advertising or disease promotion campaigns to the general public…This influence has helped to create and reinforce a narrow biological approach to the explanation and treatment of mental disorders and has led to the exclusion of alternative” treatments.5

Such websites do not mention company’s product but rather market the “disease.” In advertising, it can be accomplished through a strategy known as “condition branding,” where “mental illness” can be pitched just like cars, beer or laundry detergent.  Witness the brand name “bipolar” and “social anxiety disorder” that drug companies marketed at a fever pitch.

John Read, PhD, Psychology Department, University of Auckland did an analysis of 54 random “advocacy” groups for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) through the Internet. The results, published in the Journal of Trauma & Dissociation this year, found 42% of the websites received drug company funding. The researchers found:

  • “Patients tend to trust these organizations to act in an unbiased manner” but as earlier researchers argued in some cases “patient organizations have become a mouthpiece for the pharmaceutical industry in influencing regulatory authorities.”
  •  “Drug company influence within the area of mental health is prevalent and now extends to the Internet. This influence is not always transparent. This study suggests that drug company sponsorship of websites leads to a greater emphasis on pharmacology in the treatment of PTSD,” Dr. Read’s report concludes.6

ADHD Allies/ADHD Moms

In June 2008 Concerta was given an expanded indication by FDA and is now indicated for patients aged 6 to 65.7 In July 2008, McNeill Pediatrics—a subsidiary of Ortho-McNeill Pharmaceuticals—launched what they called an “unbranded group” called “ADHD Moms.” ADHD Moms markets the trademarked name “Mom-bassadors” to get mothers into the Facebook page. 8

  • McNeill spuriously claims “the group is not product-specific, nor are there any advertisements for the company’s ADHD drug Concerta (methylphenidate).” Well not directly, but providing material for the site is a Dr. Quinn, a paid consultant and speaker for McNeil Pediatrics. 9  April White, who also provides content is a paid spokesperson for McNeil Pediatrics.10
  • On April 22 2009, McNeill launched a second ADHD-focused Facebook page called “ADHD Allies,” this time targeting adults.  The “Allies” are board members of another front group Attention Deficit Disorder Association (ADDA), funded by McNeill.11
  • The pharmaceutical company has trademarked “ADHD Allies” and “ADHD Moms.”  ADHD Allies was responsible for a “2008 Harris Interactive survey of 1,000 adults with ADHD.” Not surprisingly, the survey found the condition significantly affects them. 12

Log onto The Bipolar Journey: Living With Bipolar Depression website and while it does show AstraZeneca on the home page, there’s no mention of its blockbuster antipsychotic drug Seroquel, approved by the FDA in 2006 for “bipolar.”  The site looks like a patient information site providing facts about the “disease” and misleadingly saying that it may be caused by a chemical imbalance—for which there is no evidence.

It refers people to the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill (NAMI) that has received $23 million recently from at least 18 drug companies. The site shows that of 17 cites for the exhibit’s showing in 2009, 12 are conferences or events put on by NAMI.

It also links to The Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance, a group that received close to $1 million in pharmaceutical company funding in 2007.

According to an August 27 2009 press announcement, AstraZeneca launched its interactive exhibit, endorsed by New York psychiatrist Janet Taylor. The press release does not mention that Dr. Taylor has financial ties to the company.13

In 2005, global sales for Seroquel reached $2.8 billion.  October 20, 2006, company announced Seroquel was FDA approved for bipolar.14 Within a year, sales reached $3 billion and then soared again in 2008 to $4.66 billion.15

By funding social media front groups that talk only about the “disorder,” drug companies can overcome fears of running afoul of FDA regulations that govern drug advertising and “are embracing social networks to help brand and position their companies in a positive light with consumers and practitioners.”  The top 10 drug companies using social media are: Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca US, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi-Aventis, Roche, and Merck.16

This post was written by CCHR International.
Coming next from CCHR Int: Psycho Pharma Front Groups

1 “FDA Addresses Drug Ads in Online Social Media,” Red Orbit, 13 Nov. 2009.

3 “FDA Addresses Drug Ads in Online Social Media,” Red Orbit, 13 Nov. 2009.

5 Joanne Moncrief, in a “Study of the Influence of the Pharmaceutical Industry on Academic and Practical Psychiatry,” http://www.critpsynet.freeuk.com/pharmaceuticalindustry.htm

6 http://www.isst-d.org/jtd/mansell_&_read_ptsd_drug_cos_&_internet%20.pdf; Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 10:9–23, 2009

12 “Adults ‘Facing’ ADHD: ADHD Allies™ Offers Unique Online Community for Adults with ADHD on New Facebook® Page,” http://multivu.prnewswire.com/mnr/concerta/36533/

RETURN TO BLOGS PAGE


  • Share/Bookmark

One of the Pharma funded psychiatrists that spearheaded national child drugging campaign

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

Catherine Lewis
Alternative Health Journal
November 9, 2009

Unfortunately it is becoming more and more common to hear reports of how the pharmaceutical industry is manipulating scientific findings and in turn readily handing out prescriptions to children, often unnecessarily. The factor that seems to be driving this trend is very simply the almighty dollar. Keep reading to find out who is responsible for this recent trend, and why your doctor may be getting your child hooked on unnecessary drugs.

There seems to be no choice but for Americans to question the validity of the pharmaceutical-industrial complex and the desire of its leaders to prey on unsuspecting people with the ultimate goal of padding their pockets. It seems that this industry has joined with the mental health profession as well.

Who Is Responsible for Putting Children on Psychiatric Drugs?

When asking the question, “Who is responsible?” there is at least one name that stands out. Dr. Joseph Biederman of Harvard University is a world renowned child psychiatrist.  Biederman has received awards of excellence from both the American Psychiatric Association and the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. He is on the editorial board of multiple journals, a reviewer for most of the psychiatric journals, and served as a grant reviewer in the Child Psychopathology and Treatment Review Committee of the NIMH.

Biederman is a very high-profile doctor that spear-headed the outbreak of children on psychiatric drugs. Biederman reportedly received $1.6 million from drug makers between 2000 and 2006. However, he failed to report most of this to his university, which may well have considered this to be a conflict of interest.

Read entire article: http://www.alternativehealthjournal.com/article/why_is_your_doctor_getting_your_child_hooked_on_unnecessary_drugs/3859

And the others: http://www.cchrint.org/cchr-issues/the-corrupt-alliance-of-the-psychiatric-pharmaceutical-industry/

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark

In UK, Doctors under fire as an alarming numbers of children are given drugs to combat depression and ADHD

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

Jenny Hope
Daily Mail
October 30, 2009

The number of prescriptions being given to children with hyperactivity, depression and other mental health problems has soared over two years, according to new figures.

Over 420,000 prescriptions were issued to children under 16 with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in 2007 – up 33 per cent since 2005.

The number went up 51 per cent for youngsters aged 16-18, reaching 40,000 in 2007.

During this period NHS guidance endorsed at least three drugs for ADHD where other treatments have failed, despite fears about side effects and some critics complaining it medicalises antisocial behaviour.

More than 113,000 prescriptions of antidepressants were issued to children under 16 in 2007, a six per cent increase over two years.

Almost 108,000 antidepressant prescriptions went to 16-18-year-olds, which was unchanged over the period.

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark

Children turning psychotic with ADHD drugs; kids as young as five attempting suicide on stimulant drugs

Monday, October 12th, 2009

Kate Sikora
The Courier-Mail
October 12, 2009

CHILDREN as young as five have attempted suicide or are severely depressed while on the controversial drugs to treat ADHD.

The Daily Telegraph has obtained the adverse reaction reports from the Therapeutic Goods Administration, which showed at least 30 children have had severe psychotic episodes and wanted to kill themselves.

One seven-year-old boy last year became so depressed while on Ritalin he tried to commit suicide.

The number of serious reactions to ADHD drugs has doubled in three years, now up to 827.

But the true extent of the side effects is unknown, with many doctors and parents under-reporting the impact, experts said.

The use of heavy stimulants has been questioned by child experts who believe the drugs, including the failed adult anti-depressant Strattera, could be masking true psychological problems of children.

Read entire article: http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,26201402-5006012,00.html

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark

No More ADHD

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009

by Dr. Mary Ann Block
Author, No More ADHD:Ten Steps to Help Your Child’s Attention and Behavior without Drugs

Because of my medical training, my goal as a physician is to look for and treat the underlying conditions causing the patient’s problem, rather than just covering up those symptoms with drugs. I have seen and treated thousands of children from all over the United States, who had previously been labeled ADHD and treated with amphetamine drugs. By taking a thorough history and giving these children a complete physical exam as well as doing lab tests and allergy testing, I have consistently found that these children do not have ADHD, but instead have allergies, dietary problems, nutritional deficiencies, thyroid problems and learning difficulties that are causing their symptoms. All of these medical and educational problems can be treated, allowing the child to be successful in school and life, without being drugged.

The Annals of Allergy, reported in 1993, that children with allergies perform less successfully in school, across the board, than children who do not have allergies.

A study in the Journal of Pediatrics, 1995, reported that children who ate sugar had an increase in adrenaline levels that caused difficulty concentrating, irritability and anxiety. A double blind, crossover study published in Biological Psychiatry, 1979, found that Vitamin B6 was more effective than Ritalin in a group of hyperactive children. Another study found that children with magnesium deficiencies were characterized by excessive fidgeting and learning difficulties. There are many more studies indicating an association between nutritional deficiencies and attention and behavior problems.

There is no valid test for ADHD. The diagnosis called ADHD is completely subjective. While some compare ADHD to diabetes, there really is no comparison. Diabetes is an insulin deficiency that can be objectively measured. Insulin is a hormone manufactured by the body and needed for life. ADHD cannot be objectively measured and amphetamines are not made by the body or needed for life.

The drugs used on children diagnosed ADHD come with a host of potential side effects. According to the manufacturers of the drugs, the following side effects can and do occur: insomnia, anorexia, nervousness, seizures, headaches, heart palpitations, cardiac arrhythmia, psychosis, angina, abdominal pain, hepatic coma, anemia, depressed mood, hair loss, weight loss, tachycardia (too fast a heartbeat), increased blood pressure, cardiomyopathy (weakening or change in heart muscle), dizziness and tremor to name a few. The U.S. FDA has warned ADHD drugs such as Ritalin, Adderall and Concerta can cause heart attack, stroke and sudden death. These drugs are classified as schedule II controlled substances with high abuse potential. According to reports in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the drug Ritalin has been found to be very similar to and more potent than cocaine. Ritalin and cocaine are so similar that they are used interchangeably in scientific research. There are no long-term studies on the safety and effectiveness of these amphetamine drugs, though millions of children are treated with them for years at a time.

When I was in school and when my children were in school, there was no need to drug millions of children. While there are children who have attention and behavior problems and these problems may have increased due to poor diets, an increase in soda and candy in our schools, an increase in allergies due to changes in our environment and an increase in learning problems does not mean these children have a psychiatric disorder called ADHD. It means they have medical and educational problems that can be fixed.

Most of the children I have seen who have been prescribed these drugs have never even had a physical exam. No doctor listened to their hearts even though many of the side effects are heart related. Since there is no valid test for ADHD, most doctors get the information for the diagnosis from the child’s teacher in the form of a checklist. If the teacher wants the child to be taking these drugs, all she or he has to do is fill out the checklist indicating the child has many problems in the classroom. One child was diagnosed as ADHD and prescribed Ritalin. I treated him instead. Once his allergies and learning problems were corrected he went on to become a National Merit Finalist and accepted to an Ivy League University.

Every child deserves that opportunity. Many of the parents of these children have told me that the teachers and principals have pressured them to put the children on these drugs, threatening to report them to Child Protective Services (CPS) if they do not comply. CPS actually removed a child from his home after the school reported the mother for not giving the child his drugs. The ironic thing was, she had given him the drug, but the drug made his symptoms worse, not better. I cannot imagine any reason to give a child an amphetamine to cover up symptoms when the problem can be fixed and no drug is required. Let’s give our children the medical and educational evaluations they need to diagnose the real problems. Let’s treat those real problems and give our children the future they deserve, without drugs.

Dr. Mary Ann Block is founder and Medical Director of the Block Center in the Dallas/Fort Worth area.  Dr. Block specializes in the drug-free treatment of health problems and learning disabilities and is an outspoken critic of the dangers of psychiatric drugging of children. She travels the world speaking to public and professional audiences about safer and more effective non-drug treatments for children with attention and behavior problems. Her books include No More ADHD: Ten Steps to Help Your Child’s Attention and Behavior without Drugs and No More Ritalin: Treating ADHD Without Drugs.

For more information visit Dr. Block’s website:
http://www.blockcenter.com/web_content/ADD_ADHD/ADHD.html

RETURN TO BLOGS PAGE


  • Share/Bookmark

Think psych drugs aren’t as addictive as street drugs? Think again: Adderal, Ritalin: Drug Addiction Warning

Monday, September 14th, 2009

Atlanta Recovery Center
Trans World News
September 14, 2009

Prescription stimulants, such as Adderal, Dexedrine, Concerta, or Ritalin, have been prescribed for a number of reasons.

However, what many people don’t realize is that these drugs can be habit forming, if not addictive.

“Drug addiction takes many guises,” comments Mary Rieser, Executive Director for the Atlanta Recovery Center. “Whether a student who legally takes Adderal to help them stay awake at night to study, and find themselves hooked, to the housewife trying to lose a few pounds- stimulants are addictive and drug addiction can strike the wealthy, the poor, all social levels and classes. Stories of children trading their Ritalin for other drugs are common. Illegal drugs such as cocaine and methamphetamine are also stimulants and are also highly addictive.

“Don’t let someone you know become addicted to prescription stimulants- know the facts.”

Read entire article: http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?id=121767&cat=15

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark

ADHD drug abuse by 13-19 year olds rose 76% from 1998 to 2005

Monday, August 24th, 2009

Health Day News
August 24, 2009

As more and more prescriptions are being written for medications to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), more and more children are abusing these drugs.

That’s the conclusion of new research in the September issue of Pediatrics that found the rate of ADHD medication abuse was up 76 percent from 1998 to 2005, and at the same time, the rates of prescriptions for these medications rose about 80 percent.

“We looked at all the poison control centers across the nation and found a significant increase in the number of calls for ADHD medication abuse that parallels the amount of prescriptions being written,” said Dr. Jennifer Setlik, an emergency physician at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center in Ohio and a study author.

What’s more, Setlik said, is that this study is “not an estimate of the total problem” because it looks only at data from poison control centers, but it gives doctors and parents a snapshot of the trend toward rising abuse of these medications with increasing availability.

Read entire article: http://www.ajc.com/health/content/shared-auto/healthnews/adhd/630300.html

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark

Doctors shouldn’t work for drug companies; Promoting drugs for kids to make money is absolutely criminal

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

The Alligator Editorial Board
The Independent Florida Alligator
July 21, 2009

Ritalin. Concerta. Vyvanse. Adderall. The Editorial Board is willing to bet that you know at least one person who has been prescribed one of them.

These drugs have been championed by well-known Harvard psychologist Joseph Biederman for decades. As a result, doctors have increasingly prescribed the medicines to those who may or may not need them.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, investigated Biederman’s drug company affiliations. It turns out Biederman worked as a private consultant for some drug companies, earning at least $1.6 million in the past seven years for his “advice,” according to The Boston Globe.

Grassley identified the conflict of interest that arises when the person who sets the precedent for how psychotropic drugs are dispensed is connected to drug companies. Both the companies and Biederman make bank as the drugs are dispersed.

Read entire article:  http://www.alligator.org/articles/2009/07/21/opinion/editorials/090721_eddy1.txt

« Return to news items


  • Share/Bookmark