Posts Tagged ‘Christopher Lane’

Psychiatry & the United States of Affliction: Are You Normal or Finally Diagnosed?

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is a list that can be abused to the detriment of patients and benefit of drug companies.

Miller-McCune
By Arnie Cooper
June 8, 2010

“My dear Sir, take any road, you can’t go amiss. The whole state is one vast insane asylum.” — James L. Petigru

Spend just a few minutes watching prime time television with its endless pageant of commercials for antidepressants and anti-anxiety meds and you start to wonder if USA really means the United States of Affliction.

Such “direct to consumer” drug advertising ties into one of the most far-reaching criticisms in revising the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: the potential to transform normal human behavior into a mental disorder.

This issue didn’t arise with the ongoing revision of the DMS-V. It’s long been a concern for psychiatry, which must exist uneasily alongside pharmaceutical companies’ hopes of expanding their markets and Americans’ desire for take-a-pill quick fixes. But past experiences suggest new diagnoses will reap a harvest of not fully intended consequences of patients larded with labels — and prescriptions.

Christopher Lane, an intellectual historian who has written extensively on psychiatry and culture, detailed the inclusion of “social anxiety disorder” in the DSM-III in his 2007 book, Shyness: How Normal Behavior Became a Sickness.

Lane revealed how the 15-member DSM-III task force, in its quest to establish psychiatry as a legitimate science (and riding the wave of drug companies looking to expand their markets for anti-psychotics and tranquilizers), spit out “almost over night” various new disorders, including one for those uncomfortable with social situations.

No longer need shyness be a variant of normal. Now it can be a neurochemical disorder addressable with GlaxoSmithKline’s multibillion-dollar marvel Paxil. Before safety concerns and patent expirations raised their ugly heads, antidepressants had become the second-largest selling class of drugs in the United States.

“In this desire to biologize and medicalize, with the idea that every personal crisis or problem is due to a disorder of the brain, we’ve lost sight of the vast complexity of behavioral responses to external stresses,” Lane says. Add to that some possibly dangerous side effects. Along with Prozac and Zoloft, Paxil was found to increase thoughts of suicide, especially among teens, prompting an FDA warning in 2004.

Read entire article:  http://www.miller-mccune.com/health/are-you-normal-or-finally-diagnosed-17073/

« Return to news items


Share

Natural News: Children’s temper tantrums to be reclassified as mental disorders

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

Natural News
By Ethan A. Huff
May 11, 2010

Proposed changes to the U.S. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) could include reclassifying childhood temper tantrums, teenage angst, and binge eating as psychiatric disorders. If accepted, the proposals could equal billions of dollars in new revenue for pharmaceutical companies.

The DSM is often referred to as the “bible” of the psychiatric profession. The handbook exerts significant influence on the American healthcare system, affecting everything from insurance companies and medical providers to universities and prisons. Even the legal system lends credence to its provisions.

It is precisely because of its wide scope of influence that many condemn the DSM. The manual is known for categorizing character traits and emotions as mental conditions for which medical treatment, typically drugs with highly dangerous side effects, is advised.

According to Christopher Lane, author of a 2007 critique of DSM called Shyness: How Normal Behavior Became a Sickness and professor at Northwestern University, responded to the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) proposal by saying, “The organization is clearly opening another Pandora’s box here, as well as paving the way for the medication of even greater numbers of children and teenagers cycling through emotional stages as part of normal development.”

He is right, considering the fact that if binge eating is reclassified as a psychiatric disorder, millions of Americans could instantly be declared as mentally ill. Though provisions would be included to exclude those who merely overeat, the ramifications of associating eating disorders with mental illness at all would likely include a massive increase in the number of people taking psychotropic drugs.

Read entire article:  http://www.naturalnews.com/028762_children_disorders.html

« Return to news items


Share

Psychology Today: “How Schizophrenia Became a Black Disease”—Civil rights protesters were labeled schizophrenic

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

Psychology Today
By Christopher Lane
May 5, 2010

First, some preliminaries about your fascinating book, The Protest Psychosis: How Schizophrenia Became a Black Disease (Beacon, 2010). How did you come to unearth such a trove of important documents at Ionia State Hospital in northeastern Michigan?

Ionia State Hospital for the Criminally Insane was, for much of the twentieth century, one of the nation’s more notorious mental asylums, occupying an incredible 529 acres, and its annual census hovered above 2,000 patients. But, like many American asylums, Ionia suffered a rapid fall from grace in the late 1960s and early 70s, during the so-called era of deinstitutionalization. By 1974, the census was a paltry 300, and in 1975 the facility closed, then quickly reopened—as a prison.

That rapid transformation fascinated me. What had happened to the patients? What had changed? Why did the hospital become a prison? I spent a long time searching for the records, and ultimately discovered that much of the hospital’s institutional memory—nearly a century of patient charts, reports, photographs, ledgers, and other artifacts-had been placed randomly in storage in the State Archive of Michigan, in Lansing. I spent another year gaining clearance from various review boards since of course the archive contains highly personal and confidential information. I first visited the archive in 2004, and then spent the next four years reviewing the charts of over 800 patients.

What I found troubled me greatly. As I write in the book, “the charts documented in minute detail the tragedy of what it meant to be warehoused in a state asylum at mid-century-and in particular, in an asylum where short court sentences devolved into lifelong incarceration. A number of charts contained yearly notes from patients to their doctors voicing such sentiments as Doc, I really think I am cured or Dear Doctor, I believe I am ready to go home, or, You have no right to keep me here. These letters stacked thirty-deep in some charts, signifying years of pleading and longing and anger, together with thirty years of responses from clinicians urging You are almost there or Perhaps next year. Invariably, the last note in each stack was a death certificate from the Ionia coroner.”

When did you first suspect that diagnostic patterns with schizophrenia had become heavily racialized?

I found dramatic racial and gender shifts in persons diagnosed with schizophrenia at Ionia during the 1960s—so much so that schizophrenia’s racial and gendered transformation became the central narrative of my book. This shift became apparent very early in my research. Before the 60s, Ionia doctors viewed schizophrenia as an illness that afflicted nonviolent, white, petty criminals, including the hospital’s considerable population of women from rural Michigan. Charts emphasized the negative impact of “schizophrenogenic styles” on these women’s abilities to perform their duties as mothers and wives. To say the least, these patients were not seen as threatening. “This patient wasn’t able to take care of her family as she should,” read one chart; another, “This patient is not well adjusted and can’t do her housework”; and another, “She got confused and talked too loudly and embarrassed her husband.”

By the mid-to-late-1960s, however, schizophrenia was a diagnosis disproportionately applied to the hospital’s growing population of African-American men from urban Detroit. Perhaps the most shocking evidence I uncovered was that hospital charts “diagnosed” these African American men in part because of their symptoms, but also because of their connections to the civil rights movement. Many of the men were sent to Ionia after convictions for crimes that ranged from armed robbery to participation in civil-rights protests, to property destruction during periods of civil unrest, such as the Detroit riots of 1968. Charts stressed how hallucinations and delusions rendered these men as threats, not only to other patients, but also to clinicians, ward attendants, and to society itself. You’d see comments like Paranoid against his doctors and the police. Or, Would be a danger to society were he not in an institution.

Read the entire article:  http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/side-effects/201005/how-schizophrenia-became-black-disease-interview-jonathan-metzl

« Return to news items


Share

Psychiatry’s latest mental disorders—”Creativity? There’s a pill for that. Not to mention nonconformity and quirkiness”

Tuesday, April 27th, 2010

Not to mention nonconformity and quirkiness — the definition of mental illness changes

Canada.com
By Sharon Kirkey
April 27, 2010

Since 1950, man has landed on the moon, made computers commonplace and harnessed nuclear power.

We’re obviously using our minds to the fullest. Yet the number of ways we can go officially crazy has nearly tripled.

The hugely influential reference book used by psychiatrists and other mental health professionals the world over to diagnose mental illness — the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders — currently lists 357 types of psychiatric afflictions, up from 128 when the first volume was published in 1952.

The psychiatric establishment says it has learned to detect more mental illness in the population than was possible a half-century ago, and that science has advanced to the point that the broadly defined disorders of the past are now seen with much greater resolution, yielding many more specific conditions.

We’re not expanding the domain, they argue, as much as we’re refining it.

But skeptics say it is less about advances in brain science and more about psychiatry shuffling more and more behaviours and reactions to life’s letdowns into boxes of mental dysfunction and assigning them codes, and that we risk becoming so overdiagnosed and overmedicated, we’ll be like the patient in The New Yorker cartoon, who asks his psychiatrist: “Could we up the dosage? I still have feelings.”

“The unavoidable conclusion is that we’ve narrowed healthy behaviour so dramatically that our quirks and eccentricities — the normal emotional range of adolescence and adulthood — have become problems we fear and expect drugs to fix,” says Christopher Lane, author of Shyness: How Normal Behavior Became a Sickness.

It’s not enough that people sometimes want to be alone, Lane says. Solitude? According to the DSM, including its criteria for “avoidant” and “schizoid”personality disorders, that could be viewed as a sign of mild psychosis, he warns. Feeling restless, keyed up or on edge could be markers of generalized anxiety disorder, and trouble sleeping a symptom of a major depressive disorder.

The more diagnostic categories added to the DSM, the more broadly they’re defined, the bigger the market of potential new drug customers grows, says Stuart Kirk, professor of social welfare at the University of California Los Angeles School of Public Affairs. Within each revision of psychiatry’s bible, pharmaceutical companies see a “bonanza” of marketing possibilities, he says.

Read entire article:  http://www.canada.com/life/Creativity+There+pill+that/2955948/story.html

« Return to news items


Share