* See note at end of this post from CCHR
UPI.com
March. 31, 2011
Click video to watch
DETROIT, March 31 (UPI) — A Detroit woman accused of using a gun in a standoff with police when child welfare workers came to take her 13-year-old daughter was released, officials said.
Maryanne Godboldo, 56, had been in custody since surrendering to police Friday after a 10-hour standoff at her home during which she allegedly fired a shot at officers, The Detroit News reported. Godboldo, released Wednesday, has said she was protecting the girl from unnecessary medication welfare workers insisted she be given.
Maryann Godboldo
“I feel wonderful and I’m very excited to see my daughter,” Godboldo said after leaving the Wayne County Jail. “The support of the community has been unbelievable.”
Godboldo has said her daughter’s physical and mental problems were caused by a bad reaction to immunizations the formerly home-schooled teen was given so she could be enrolled last year in a regular middle school.
Lawyers and family say Godboldo’s dispute with authorities is over a subsequent treatment plan that called for psychotropic drugs the mother believed were doing more harm than good.
Police said Godboldo locked the doors of her home when child welfare workers showed up with a warrant to take her daughter and allegedly fired on officers when they broke open her door.
She has been charged with assault, resisting and opposing police and using a firearm in the commission of a felony.
Read article here: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/03/31/Mom-in-Detroit-standoff-incidnt-released
*Note from CCHR: In 2004, following nationwide reports of parents being coerced, pressured and forced to drug their children as a condition of attending school, including Child Protective Services threatening parents to have their children removed from their custody, CCHR worked for the introduction and passage of the Prohibition on Mandatory Medication Amendment which passed into federal law in 2004 and states
Prohibition on mandatory medication.
“(a) IN GENERAL. – The State educational agency shall prohibit State and local educational personnel from requiring a child to obtain a prescription for substances covered by the Controlled Substances Act as a condition of attending school, receiving an evaluation under section 614 (a) and (c) or receiving services.
There are three things we want to point out related to this incident in Detroit :
1) Was the mother charged with medical neglect by Child Protective Services and was it under this guise that they attempted to have her child removed from her custody? (See point 3 regarding ‘medical neglect’ in cases of parents refusing to administer a psychiatric drug to a child)
2) The law above [unfortunately] only states that it is illegal for schools to require parents to administer any drug covered under “The Controlled Substances Act” which are drugs classifed by the US DEA as Schedule ll drugs (highly addictive – including Ritalin, Concerta, Cocaine, Morphine, Opium etc). This needs to be changed to all psychotropic drugs particularly considering antipsychotics and antidepressants are documented by the FDA to cause suicidal ideation as well as death. No parent should ever be required to give their child a potentially lethal drug, or face losing their child to “Child Protective Services”. The language change was something that CCHR opposed as the original language of the bill included prohibiting schools from requiring a parent to give their child ANY psychotropic drug as a condition of attending school.
3) There needs to be a new federal law which prohibits any parent from being pressured, coerced and/or required by government agencies (especially Child Protective Services which has the power to have a child removed from a parent’s custody) to administer any type of psychiatric drug to their child, considering there is no medical or scientific test to prove any child has a ‘mental illness.’ Therefore the bogus charges being levied at these parents of “medical neglect” are completely unjustified—in fact, fraudulent. Without evidence of a “medical condition” (meaning something that can be medically proven by x-ray, lab test or brain scan) it is impossible to cite “medical neglect” should a parent refuse to administer a potentially lethal drug to their child. Psychiatric drugs given to children including stimulants, antidepressants and antipsychotics, are documented by international drug regulatory agencies to cause; heart attack, stroke, mania, psychosis, worsening depression, fatal blood clots, diabetes, death, violence, suicidal ideation and more.
See CCHR International’s Psychiatric Drug Database for all international studies and warnings on psychiatric drugs: http://www.cchrint.org/psychdrugdangers/
News Feed
Related Posts
Tags: antipsychotic, Child welfare, Detroit, Detroit mom, Maryanne Godboldo, mental problems, psychotropic drugs, stand off with police, unnecessar medication
This entry was posted on Thursday, March 31st, 2011 at 1:56 pm and is filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Donate
This is an atrocity, Government forcing a parent to administer psychotropic Drugs to her daughter. In many cases these drugs harm the person more then help them. I am alarmed when the government steps over the line of invading a family’s private matters that has to do with family decisions. This is a family matter not a Governmental matter. What a waste of tax payers money. Focus on families that abuse their children, not families that are watching out for their children’s well being like this woman is. We should stay away from drugs if we can not use them.
They interfere when we don’t need them to and turn a blind eye when they should be interfering. I could never get it. What you do is beg for help and then they will ignore you.
if the lawyers want to start a petition this is the site to do it..
http://www.change.org/petition
i dont know what to write.. but i think a petition would help.. i dont know.
Shooting at the police put her life and the life of her daughter at risk.
The details of this case are unclear. It’s fair to assume that the mothers judgement was impaired.
The government’s arrogant actions have spread like a virus and assert ITS interest supersedes OURS. Stand Firm, Maryann. I Stand with you!
Assuming there was no proof this mother was unfit regarding the care, custody, and education of her daughter, she should be recognized as truly courageous! She embraced the responsibility of protecting (truly “CARING”) for her daughter, despite societies’ rampant cowardliness in StandingUp to an out of control government and its affiliated providers (aka psychiatric “hospitals”).
My daughter (14 yrs), Chloe, was housed by Child ‘Protective’ Services in Psychiatric “hospitals” for Type 1 Diabetes mngmt for over 6 months despite my continued fight for her return home. Illinois has a law allowing a 12 year old to refuse their fit home and be thrust into the criminal infested, hellish environment of foster care. A govt. health care racket, ya’ think?
We rescued Chloe and she is home after 1 1/2 years. One of the former “hospitals” reported me for medical neglect, because I removed her from the facility “AMA” (Against Medical Advice). Well, of course I did! I don’t negotiate with kidnappers or Nazis!
You Up yet? facebook.com/StandUp4Chloe -Chloe’s Mama Grizzly, Shelley
No, it’s not fair to assume the mother’s judgment was impaired. It IS fair to assume that she was unwilling to give up her child because she knew full well that she was being bullied in a direction that would ultimately bring devastating consequences to her daughter and her family, and was willing put herself in harm’s way to prevent that from happening. She should be commended for standing up to this collection of bought-and-paid-for thugs and their misbegotten intrusions into people’s lives.