Archive for October, 2010

$257 Million Lawsuit Award Against Antipsychotic Drug Maker: One of the largest in the history of the state & expected to set nationwide precedent

Sunday, October 17th, 2010

The Advertiser

Lawsuit Award May Set  Record

by William Johnson

$257 million verdict in a product liability lawsuit.

The award came late Thursday evening in a case involving the drug

Risperdal, a popular antipsychotic administered for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder manufactured by Janssen, a division of Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., which is part of Johnson & Johnson.

The jury, which has been hearing the case for almost two months, found the firm misled Louisiana doctors about the possible side effects of the drug.

State Attorney General Buddy Caldwell’s office had argued the New Brunswick, N.J.-based company had violated a state law against misrepresentation and fraud.

Caldwell’s office argued the company sent letters to more than 7,500 doctors and made more than 27,000 phone calls that improperly claimed the drug was safer than other competing medications and minimized Risperdal’s link to diabetes.

The drug has been prescribed to more than

10 million people worldwide and generates about $2.1 billion in annual sales for Janssen.

“This verdict sends a loud message to those who knowingly try to defraud the system. Those who deceive the state must pay,” Caldwell said in a statement Friday.

Michael Heinley, a spokesman for Janssen, said the company is disappointed with the jury’s decision and will appeal.

“We believe the jury was not appropriately instructed on applicable legal standards and that critical and highly relevant evidence was excluded,” Heinley said Friday.

The St. Landry Parish jury’s judgement, which has yet to be formally filed, is expected to set a nationwide precedent.

The drug is also the subject of more than 26 lawsuits throughout the nation that allege it causes strokes, diabetes and other potentially fatal complications in adults.

The state, represented by the Opelousas law firm of Morrow, Morrow, Ryan and Bassett, had originally asked for $440 million in direct damages with other factors that could have pushed the total award to more than $2 billion.

While the state did not get all it asked for, St. Landry Parish Clerk of Courts Charles Jagneaux said the verdict still amounts to the largest judgement ever assessed in the parish and one of the largest in the history of the state.

The Associated Press contributed to this story.

http://www.theadvertiser.com/article/20101016/NEWS01/10160309/1002/Lawsuit-award-may-set-record

« Return to news items


Share

Are Soldiers Suicides Caused by Prescription Drugs?—At Fort Brag 4,994 troops on antidepressants/664 on antipsychotics

Friday, October 15th, 2010

http://www.opednews.com/images/oenearthlogo.gif

by Martha Rosenberg

The suicide rate among troops is astonishing.

In 2009 there were 160 active duty suicides, 239 suicides within the total Army including the Reserves, 146 active duty deaths from drug overdoses and high risk behavior and 1,713 suicide attempts, says the Army’s suicide report, released in July.

Not only are more troops dying from their own hand than combat says the Army report, titled Health Promotion, Risk Reduction, Suicide Prevention, 36 percent of the suicides were troops who were never deployed.

Also astonishing is the psychoactive drug rate among active duty-aged troops, 18 to 34, which is up 85 percent since 2003 according to the military health plan, Tricare. Since 2001, 73,103 prescriptions for Zoloft have been dispensed, 38,199 for Prozac, 17,830 for Paxil and 12,047 for Cymbalta says Tricare 2009 data, which includes family prescriptions. All of the drugs carry a suicide warning label.

In addition to the leap in SSRI antidepressants, prescriptions for the anticonvulsants Topamax and Neurontin rose 56 percent in the same group since 2005 says Navy Times, drugs which the FDA warned last year double suicidal thinking in patients.

In fact 4,994 troops at Fort Bragg are on antidepressants right now says the Fayetteville Observer. Six hundred and sixty-four are on an antipsychotics and “many soldiers take more than one type of medication.”

Troops may also be taking Chantix, an antismoking drug so linked to violence and self-harm Secretary of the VA, James Peake was forced to defend its use before the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs in 2008 even in drug trials . “If you know the drug induces suicidal thoughts,” an unappeased Committee chair Bob Filner D-Ca. asked Rep. Filner,” Why don’t you just stop?”

Even widely prescribed asthma drugs like Singulair and Advair are linked to suicide says the FDA and have been cited in young people’s deaths.

And who knows what happens when the drugs are mixed with mood stabilizers, insomnia and pain pills and antianxiety and antipsychotic pills, combinations which have never been tested for safety?

Links between suicide and even murder-suicide and SSRI and SNRI antidepressants have been long recognized.

Traci Johnson, a healthy 19-year-old with no mental problems, hung herself during Lilly trials of Cymbalta in the drugmaker’s own clinic in 2004. Columbine shooter Eric Harris had reportedly just switched from Zoloft to Luvox. Red Lake shooter Jeff Weise who killed 10 on a Minnesota Indian reservation in 2005 had just upped his Prozac. And the Virginia Tech shooter, Cho Seung-Hui, was also on psychoactive medications say news reports.

Yet even though Amercians have doubled their antidepressants since 1999 so that 10 percent of the population or 27 million now take them suicides have climbed by five percent since 1999 and 16 percent in middle aged adults says an article in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine in 2008.

In fact, the high percentage of civilian suicides on psychoactive drugs is probably the clearest indication that military life is not the only cause of the shocking troop suicides: In September alone, there were 18 civilian suicides, 11 murders, 2 murder suicides and other violence linked to people who were using or had used antidepressants, according to published reports. http://www.ssristories.com/index.php?sort=what&p=recent

A 54-year-old respiratory patient with a breathing tube and an oxygen tank and no previous criminal record held up a bank in Mobile. She had gone off her antidepressants.

An enraged man in Australia, also off his antidepressants, chased his mailman and threatened to cut his throat…for bringing him junk mail.

And a 58-year-old Amarillo man with no criminal history tried to abduct three people, killing an Oklahoma grandmother in the process. He had “an antidepressant in his blood,” said police.

Also in the thirty day period, a 60-year-old grandmother in Seattle killed three family members and herself; a disc jockey in Bristol, UK set himself on fire; and a man in Exeter, UK man was determined to have stabbed himself in the heart. All were on antidepressants.

Finally, in the month of September, legal proceedings began against two mothers and a father charged with killing their own children.

Over 4,000 published reports of violent and bizarre behavior of people affected by antidepressants on the web archive ssristories.com reveal the same out of character violence and self harm in civilians, currently seen in the military.

Twenty people set themselves on fire. Ten bit their victims (including a biter who was sleepwalking and a woman, on Prozac, who bit her 87-year-old mother into critical condition.) Three men in the 70s and 80s attack their wives with hammers. Many stab their victims obsessively — one even stabs furniture after killing his wife — and 14 parents drown their children, a crime seldom heard of before the 2001 Andrea Yates case. Yates drowned her five children on the antidepressant Effexor which manufacturer Wyeth (now Pfizer) “issued no public warning” about says the Associated Press.

Then there’s the North Carolina pilot on Zoloft who sings, “I’m going down for the last time,” into the cockpit voice recorder before he crashes his plane in June. And the Mayor of Coppell, Texas, Jayne Peters who kills herself and her daughter in July over the grief of losing her husband. Police find antidepressants at the home.

Such murder-suicides committed by women used to be rare says Betty Henderson the web site’s moderator and researcher. “Before the SSRI antidepressants, women committed five percent of the murder-suicides and now they account for almost 15 percent of this type of violence,” she said in an AlterNet interview.

Antidepressants are also causing women to become neo sexual predators says Henderson. “There have been more than a dozen recent cases of women school teachers molesting their young students under the influence or withdrawal of antidepressants. Who heard of this type of sexual aberration before the antidepressant craze?”

Why don’t doctors and media outlets publicize the names of these volatile drugs?

It’s a good questions said Dr. Gary Kohls, a Minnesota family practitioner, in an oped written after Iraq veteran Matthew Magdzas killed his pregnant wife, their 13-month-old daughter, their dogs and himself in Wisconsin in August.

“Nobody in the media has, to my knowledge, had the courage to report what the drugs were, nor have they interviewed the physician or his clinic to find out the rationale for prescribing drugs that have common violence-inducing effects (with black box warnings stating that in the prescribing information),” he writes. “Therefore nothing has been learned from this important teachable moment, probably because revealing the common reality of prescription drug-induced violence would be economically harmful for the sacred cows of Big Pharma and Big Medicine.”

Still, Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va. called the one of every six troops who are now on psychoactive drugs “pretty astounding and also very troubling,” in Senate hearings this year and Retired Col. Bart Billings, a former Army psychologist who has also testified before Congress, says, “I feel flat out that psychiatrists are directly responsible for deaths in our military, for some of these suicides,” in a March Marine Times article. “I think it’s criminal, what they are doing.”

Even Katie Bagosy, the wife of Marine Sgt. Tom Bagosy who took his own life in May indicts the Neurontin medication he was prescribed for his downfall.

“He told me, ‘It all started to get worse when I got on this medication.’ Looking back, that was the beginning of the end,” she says in an article called A Prescription For Tragedy in the current National Journal.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/Are-Soldiers-Suicides-Caus-by-Martha-Rosenberg-101015-973.html

« Return to news items


Share

Johnson & Johnson to Pay $257 Million Over Antipsychotic Drug Marketing Tactics

Friday, October 15th, 2010

By Jef Feeley and Margaret Cronin Fisk

Oct. 15 (Bloomberg) — Johnson & Johnson lost a $257.7 million jury verdict in Louisiana for making misleading claims about the safety of the company’s Risperdal antipsychotic drug.

J&J officials defrauded the state’s Medicaid system by wrongfully touting Risperdal as superior to competing antipsychotic drugs and minimizing its links to diabetes, said jurors in state court in Opelousas, Louisiana.

Yesterday’s verdict is the second trial loss in a state lawsuit brought over Risperdal marketing. A West Virginia judge in a non-jury trial last year awarded $3.95 million, finding the company misled doctors about the risks and benefits of Risperdal. New Brunswick, New Jersey-based J&J appealed.

Michael Heinley, a spokesman for J&J’s Ortho-McNeil Janssen Pharmaceuticals unit, said the company is disappointed with the jury’s decision and will appeal.

“We believe the jury was not appropriately instructed on applicable legal standards and that critical and highly relevant evidence was excluded,” he said in an interview.

The jury found 35,542 violations of the state’s Medical Assistance Programs Integrity Law and imposed a penalty of $7,250 for each. The total $257.7 million verdict is the fifth- largest in the U.S. so far in 2010, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

‘False and Misleading’

“You can’t come into Louisiana and disseminate false and misleading information,” Patrick Morrow, who represented the state, said after the verdict in a phone interview. “I’m sure this matter will be in the appellate courts for years to come. This is the first step.”

The state’s case centered on drug safety claims that J&J and Ortho-McNeil Janssen made in November 2003 correspondence to 700,000 doctors. In those letters, J&J touted Risperdal as safer than competing antipsychotics such as Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly & Co.’s Zyprexa and London-based AstraZeneca Plc’s Seroquel. Risperdal global sales peaked at $4.5 billion in 2007, declining after the company lost patent protection.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration responded with a warning letter saying J&J made false and misleading claims that minimized the potentially fatal risks of diabetes and overstated the drug’s superiority to rival medicines.

7,604 Letters

Lawyers for the state asked jurors to hold J&J liable for the 7,604 letters it sent to Louisiana doctors and regulators making those claims along with more than 27,542 sales calls in the state made by the drugmaker’s representatives in 2003 and 2004.

The state sought a total of $351 million in damages, including penalties of $10,000 for each fraudulent claim and misrepresentation in violation of the Medical Assistance Programs Integrity Law.

Read the rest of the article here: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-10-15/j-j-told-to-pay-257-7-million-over-risperdal-marketing-tactics.html

« Return to news items


Share

Is Free Thinking A Mental Illness?

Thursday, October 14th, 2010

PrisonPlanet.com

Off the Grid
Oct 14, 2010

Is nonconformity and freethinking a mental illness?  According to the newest addition of the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), it certainly is.  The manual identifies a new mental illness called “oppositional defiant disorder” or ODD.  Defined as an “ongoing pattern of disobedient, hostile and defiant behavior,” symptoms include questioning authority, negativity, defiance, argumentativeness, and being easily annoyed.

The DSM-IV is the manual used by psychiatrists to diagnose mental illnesses and, with each new edition, there are scores of new mental illnesses.  Are we becoming sicker?  Is it getting harder to be mentally healthy?  Authors of the DSM-IV say that it’s because they’re better able to identify these illnesses today.  Critics charge that it’s because they have too much time on their hands.

New mental illnesses identified by the DSM-IV include arrogance, narcissism, above-average creativity, cynicism, and antisocial behavior.  In the past, these were called “personality traits,” but now they’re diseases.

And there are treatments available.

All of this is a symptom of our over-diagnosing and overmedicating culture.  In the last 50 years, the DSM-IV has gone from 130 to 357 mental illnesses.  A majority of these illnesses afflict children.  Although the manual is an important diagnostic tool for the psychiatric industry, it has also been responsible for social changes.  The rise in ADD, bipolar disorder, and depression in children has been largely because of the manual’s identifying certain behaviors as symptoms.  A Washington Post article observed that, if Mozart were born today, he would be diagnosed with ADD and “medicated into barren normality.”

According to the DSM-IV, the diagnosis guidelines for identifying oppositional defiant disorder are for children, but adults can just as easily suffer from the disease.  This should give any freethinking American reason for worry.

The Soviet Union used new “mental illnesses” for political repression.  People who didn’t accept the beliefs of the Communist Party developed a new type of schizophrenia.  They suffered from the delusion of believing communism was wrong.  They were isolated, forcefully medicated, and put through repressive “therapy” to bring them back to sanity.

When the last edition of the DSM-IV was published, identifying the symptoms of various mental illnesses in children, there was a jump in the diagnosis and medication of children.  Some states have laws that allow protective agencies to forcibly medicate, and even make it a punishable crime to withhold medication.  This paints a chilling picture for those of us who are nonconformists.

Although the authors of the manual claim no ulterior motives but simply better diagnostic practices, the labeling of freethinking and nonconformity as mental illnesses has a lot of potential for abuse.  It can easily become a weapon in the arsenal of a repressive state.

Read the article here:  http://www.prisonplanet.com/is-free-thinking-a-mental-illness.html

« Return to news items


Share

Author of ‘Sex, Lies and Pharmaceuticals’ Criticizes ‘Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder’

Wednesday, October 13th, 2010

Wall Street Journal

by Alicia Mundy
October 13, 2010
Is female sexual dysfunction a medical condition?

Drug companies have sure been trying to make you think so, says researcher and journalist Ray Moynihan in his new book, “Sex, Lies and Pharmaceuticals.” So far, though, their efforts to get anything approved by the FDA to treat hypoactive sexual desire disorder, to use industry lingo, have been for naught.

Most recently, Boehringer Ingelheim stopped the development of flibanserin, which was intended to boost sex drive in women and was originally studied as an antidepressant. An FDA advisory panel rejected the drug in June after the formal FDA review criticized data on the drug’s ability to increase libido. The German pharma company said the decision to cease development was “not made lightly,” and that it continues to believe in the benefits the drug “would have for women suffering with HSDD.”

“It’s quite significant that [Boehringer] abandoned that after so much hype,” Moynihan tells the Health Blog.

He and his co-author Barbara Mintzes argue in their book that HSDD is largely a creation of the pharma industry. They write that 1990s research claiming that about 43% of women suffer from the disorder sprang from a questionnaire that grouped all sexual desire issues together, without regard to severity, frequency or whether the source was emotional or physical.

Moynihan lambastes drug-industry-financed patient advocacy groups, medical associations and “key opinion leaders” for a global marketing strategy aimed at convincing doctors and regulators that female sexual dysfunction was a medical condition in need of a pharmaceutical treatment.

Read the rest of the article here: http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2010/10/13/author-of-sex-lies-and-pharmaceuticals-criticizes-hypoactive-sexual-desire-disorder/

« Return to news items


Share

Public ‘misled’ by drug trial claims

Wednesday, October 13th, 2010


Tablets
BBC NEWS
October 13, 2010
by Michelle Roberts

Doctors and patients are being misled about the effectiveness of some drugs because negative trial results are not published, experts have warned.

Writing in the British Medical Journal, they say that pharmaceutical companies should be forced to publish all data, not just positive findings.

The German team give the example of the antidepressant reboxetine, saying publications have failed to show the drug in a true light.

Pfizer maintains its drug is effective.    Reboxetine (Edronax), made by Pfizer, is used in many European countries, including the UK.

But its rejection by US drug regulators raised doubts about its effectiveness, and led some to hunt for missing data.  This is not the first time a large drug company

has come under fire about its published drug trial data.

Trial information

Pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) was criticised for failing to raise the alarm on the risk of suicidal behaviour associated with its antidepressant Seroxat.

GSK rejected claims that it improperly withheld drug trial information.

But GSK has also been forced to defend itself over allegations about hiding negative data regarding another of its drugs, Avandia, which is used to treat diabetes.

Now researchers from The German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care say there is unpublished trial data for Pfizer’s antidepressant reboxetine that should be made public because it could change views about the drug.

Dr Beate Wieseler and colleagues carried out their own assessment of reboxetine, looking at the results of 13 trials, including eight previously unpublished trials from the manufacturer Pfizer.

They found the drug was no better than a placebo in terms of remission and response rates. And its benefit was inferior when compared with other similar antidepressants.

Furthermore, a higher rate of patients had side effects with reboxetine than with placebo. And more stopped taking the drug because of side effects compared with those taking a placebo or a different antidepressant.

Biased picture

The researchers said there has been a publication bias and this had overestimated the benefit of reboxetine and underestimated potential harm. And, they said, it was a widespread problem that applied to many of the drugs in use today.

“Our findings underline the urgent need for mandatory publication of trial data,” they say in the BMJ.

They warn that the lack of all information means policy makers are unable to make informed decisions.

Read the rest of this article here:  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-11521873

« Return to news items


Share

Under China’s Current System of compulsory mental health treatment, healthy people are being forced into psych hospitals

Tuesday, October 12th, 2010

Note from CCHR:  To watch PBS News Special Report  on political dissidents and petitioners in China who are being sentenced to psychiatric hospitals: click here http://3.ly/F5d

Asia One

by Shan Juan

BEIJING – Members of the legal profession have warned that loopholes in China’s current system of compulsory mental health treatment are at risk of forcing healthy people into psychiatric hospitals.

A report compiled by two civil charities, the Psychosis and Social Observation and the Shenzhen-based Hengping Institute, pointed out the abusive and disorderly use of the system, which has been in practice for more than 100 years.

The report, released on Sunday, World Mental Health Day, was based on a three-year study of more than 100 cases of forced psychiatric treatment, 30 laws and regulations on the subject, as well as 300 news reports.

It was issued following recent media reports about forced treatment for the healthy people in psychiatric hospitals.

“In many cases, it’s because the current system of compulsory mental health treatment is abused,” said Huang Xuetao, a lawyer and legal aid volunteer based in Shenzhen.

Under the current system, people can be sent to asylums for treatment against their will by blood relatives or spouses, who only need to claim that they are suffering from a serious mental illness.

Once committed, they are only eligible to be discharged from the hospitals by those who had them committed in the first place. Afterward, the person who had them committed automatically becomes their guardian.

“In most cases, they were sent to hospitals at the request of their relatives, with whom they probably had an economic dispute”, said Huang.

In the hospital, they were forced to take medicine, receive injections or undergo operations, he said, citing some cases of forced psychiatric treatment.

Li Renbing, a lawyer at the Sino Promise Law Firm in Beijing, said: “These people had no right to appeal while in hospital. Even after they were discharged and appealed against their confinement, the compensations they received were usually very low.”

Zhu Jinhong, whose mother had her sent to a psychiatric hospital in East China’s Jiangsu province following a property dispute in March, said: “I was wrongly diagnosed as having mental illnesses and was hospitalized even before the doctors met me.”

After being kept there for almost 200 days, she was rescued by a group of lawyers and journalists, according to earlier media reports.

“Dozens of nurses surrounded me and gave me medicine against my will,” she recalled.

Some psychiatric hospitals admit mentally healthy people for economic reasons, rather than those of health, Huang said.

“I am shocked at the way some doctors think,” he said. “In their pursuit of profit, they have no morality.”

Some law enforcement agencies like the police have been reported of abusing their power and sending people who they assume to be mentally ill or pose a danger to public security for psychiatric treatment, according to the report.

Read the rest of the article here: http://health.asiaone.com/Health/News/Story/A1Story20101012-241843.html

« Return to news items


Share

I lost ten years of my life as a middle class, NHS sponsored drug addict…

Monday, October 11th, 2010

( NHS—National Health Services)

The Daily Mail, UK

By Philip Robinson
October 12,  2010

Philip Robinson was 25 when he went to his GP with mild depression. The pills he was prescribed changed his life, turning him into a ‘zombie-like’ addict — just one of the 1.5 ­million Britons whose lives have been ruined by prescription drugs. Here, with extraordinary candour, he reveals how he battled to get his life back.

The problem began when I got married. ­Uncertain about the commitment I had just made and torn between wanting to leave my wife and not wanting to hurt her, I started to drink.

I wasn’t desperately depressed, nor was I drinking myself to oblivion. In fact, compared with my fellow journalists on the lads’ magazine Loaded, where I worked at the time, my drinking wasn’t a problem; I was just going through a low point.

It was 1998. I was 25 years old, and had been married for just a year when I went for the doctor’s appointment that would drive me to the edge of insanity and rob me of the next ten years of my life.

Back from the brink: Philip with wife Anna and their children

Back from the brink: Philip with wife Anna and their children. He became hooked on tranquillisers prescribed to beat mild depression

I was told, in the nicest ­possible way, that I was a depressed ­alcoholic. I was so shocked I gave up drinking immediately. I have not touched a drop since.

Then the doctor prescribed 90 Valium pills and a bottle of beta blockers to help with stress, and recommended I visit a psychiatrist in Harley Street.

I can still remember looking at the bottle in disbelief. I’d seen people thrown out of nightclubs for possessing two of these pills. The doctor had just given me 90!

What I didn’t realise at the time was that antidepressants and tranquillisers create long-term users. Thanks to the pills that my doctor had just handed over like Smarties, I was already on the road to what is known as ‘involuntary tranquilliser addiction’.

Put simply, this is where people seeking short-term help for ­anxiety end up hooked on ­powerful mood-altering drugs, sometimes for life. I had just been turned into a middle-class, NHS-­sponsored junkie, one of the 1.5 million Britons addicted to prescribed medication.

It comes at a price for the NHS, too: the health service spends £3 billion a year on tranquillisers and antidepressants alone.

Even back then I was shocked to be given so many drugs by the NHS. I remember one colleague noting the number of pills I was packing away in the course of day and telling me to take half. But, as far as I was ­concerned, I’d obtained these drugs from the doctor, and ­doctor knows best.

In Harley Street I was given my first supply of anti-­depressants and told that I was simply ­suffering from anxiety and depression.

After a few months I was no better. In fact, I was miserable, and seemed to be experiencing new nervous symptoms. In hindsight I was probably suffering side-effects from the drugs.

‘My wife became accustomed to my ever-changing personality, which altered according to whichever pills were being tried out on me by my ­psychiatrist’

Over the next few years, Anna, my wife, became accustomed to my ever-changing personality, which altered according to whichever pills and dosages were being tried out on me by my ­psychiatrist in Harley Street.

Despite the side-effects, Anna and I both trusted the doctors and I tested a host of antidepressants and mood-altering pills, trying to find the right combination that would cure my depression and give me back my life.

I remember these pills mostly for their side-effects. In one instance, I was offered a choice of two pills: one would make me fat, the other would give me a sexual dysfunction. I chose the weight gain.

Another course of pills made me vomit violently if I took them on an empty stomach.

Feeling increasingly depressed, dislocated, and paranoid, I was starting to lose sight of who I was. I began to display the symptoms of someone who was genuinely mentally ill and I took to ­sleeping all day, unable to get out of bed.

I left full-time work to recover at home and retreated from all but two or three of my friends. Anna loyally stood by me, even though I was growing more angry, depressed and unstable.

I had also become hooked on Valium. If I ran out of pills and the doctors’ surgery was closed, I would go to the hospital for an emergency prescription or face cold turkey.

Unlike illegal drugs, pres­cription drugs are incredibly convenient. You can unscrew the lid while walking for the bus, take a couple of neatly pressed, official-looking pills — medicine — and slip into a metaphorical side room. Tranquilliser users watch life though a chink in a pharmaceutical ­curtain, unable to participate in their own existence.

Philip in the grip of addiction when son Oscar was aged one: He struggled to cope with the pressures of marriage and fatherhood but his prescribed medication was more curse than cure

Philip in the grip of addiction when son Oscar was aged one: He struggled to cope with the pressures of marriage and fatherhood but his prescribed medication was more curse than cure

Five years after my first ­prescription, it seemed there wasn’t an antidepressant in the world that worked on my brain, yet my Harley Street doctor seemed determined that there was a pharmaceutical answer to my problem.

I was depressed, but Anna and I did have some moments of ­happiness and normality. We had moved into a new house and Anna was pregnant with our first child. I felt that this was my side of the arrangement, my duty, and that I owed her a child.

I loved her, but I was pretending to be a normal dutiful caring husband when, in reality, I was little more than a waxwork.

My state worsened when I was put on a powerful (and expensive) anti-epileptic drug called Depakote. Depakote is so toxic that it requires a blood test to be taken first.

I am not epileptic, but the pill is commonly given to severely ill ­people who are bipolar. As far as I knew, I had not been diagnosed with either illness.

‘I’d gone to my doctor initially to seek help because I was a young man, overwhelmed by the responsibility of marriage. At what point did I acquire severe mental health issues?’

I got my blood tests done and took Depakote alongside Effexor (an antidepressant), Valium (a tranquilliser) and Zopiclone (a sleeping pill). All I required was a pair of baggy trousers and green face paint and I could have ­doubled up as a zombie.

I found myself unable to laugh, or smile, or cry. I was taking more and more Valium to cope with mood swings related to ­taking ­Valium. I was by now taking double or triple my original ­prescribed dose.

An additional problem was that heavy doses of tranquillisers slow your breathing and suppress your gag reflex.

One night, after approximately 70mgs and some sleeping pills, I woke up aware that I was about to swallow my tongue, which had lolled back into my throat, almost creating an airtight seal. Fortunately, I had enough air in my lungs to cough it out. I remember not feeling concerned at the time.

As the Depakote established itself in my brain, I became cold and detached. I had ‘decided’ to live nocturnally, as this was optimum for my writing. I wanted peace and quiet. I avoided my young family, content with silence and the sound of blood pulsing in my ears.

After a few months of this weird, living death I was incapable of understanding or empathising with other peoples’ emotions. None of it seemed relevant.

The tipping point came when I visited my GP to speak about my continuing prescriptions. She clicked through my records on her screen and casually noted that I should continue my medication because I was listed as being on my local council’s Severe Mental Health Register.

Severe Mental Health Register? I left the appointment consumed by a sense of tragedy.

I’d gone to my doctor initially to seek help because I was a young man, overwhelmed and confused by the responsibility of marriage. At what point did I acquire severe mental health issues?

When did I become a threat to myself and others? I’m a threat to an open packet of chocolate biscuits, but not much else. I had found rock bottom.

Deep down, I knew that I couldn’t be bipolar and I had not been diagnosed as such. I was a happy child from a lovely family. My upbringing was so great that when I described it to psychologists, they seemed to be convinced I was making it up to conceal my inner torment.

I realised the only way to find out who I really was would be to get my brain chemistry back to how it was when I could last remember feeling normal. Back to before I ever saw a doctor or even had a drink.

I needed to be a kid again. I went back to see the doctor a ­couple of weeks later and told her that I had made the decision to come off the pills.

She wasn’t so sure and warned that my mental health might well collapse if I stopped taking the drugs and that there was a risk of hospitalisation. I wasn’t offered any help or advice.

Despite this prophecy of doom hanging over me, I found dropping the ­bipolar pills to be a slow, but relatively easy process. About a month after I stopped taking them, the world seemed brighter and I started to write again and feel alive.

I filled up notepads with ideas, and Anna noticed that I was more engaged with life, she could see my old self coming back.

A couple of months later, only ­Valium remained. I had now been on these mood-altering tranquillisers for ten years and lowering the dose was an agonising battle. Each milligram I took out of my bloodstream was paid for by huge ebbs and flows in my sanity levels.

Over the next two years, I threw myself into bout after bout of ­Valium withdrawal, lowering the dose each time and enduring what felt like a three month-long Mad Hatter’s tea party in my head.

Read the rest of this article here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1319716/I-lost-years-life-middle-class-NHS-sponsored-drug-addict-.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

« Return to news items


Share

Doctor: Paxil “Especially Notorious” for Causing Withdrawal

Monday, October 11th, 2010

Note from CCHR: To see the 42 international warnings/studies on Paxil visit our psychiatric drug side effects search engine http://www.cchrint.org/psychdrugdangers/drug_warnings.php or watch this video on Paxil causing addiction/withdrawal featuring attorney Karen Barth Menzies http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mpex0n0DXuc

Lawyers and Settlements

October 9, 2010

Atlanta, GA: There are a number of Paxil side effects associated with the antidepressant, and some patients continue to experience these effects even after discontinuing use of the drug.

Doctor: Paxil "Especially Notorious" for Causing WithdrawalDr. Charles Raison, an associate professor at Emory University, wrote in response to a reader’s question on CNN that about 20 percent of patients experience withdrawal symptoms when they stop taking antidepressants.

Raison says that the common symptoms of antidepressant withdrawal include dizziness, anxiety, sensory disturbances and flu-like symptoms.

According to Raison, coming off the medication slowly is important.

“The trick to lowering your chances of having these symptoms is to reduce the dose of the antidepressant as slowly as possible,” he writes. “For people who are really sensitive it can take months to get off an antidepressant slowly enough to avoid withdrawal symptoms.”

Raison also said that Paxil is “especially notorious for causing withdrawal problems” because of its short half-life in the body.

Paxil is also associated with a number of side effects for those currently taking the medication, including birth defects and depression.

Read the rest of the article here http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/articles/15134/paxil-birth-defects-side-effects-pph-7.html

« Return to news items


Share

Anxiety and Insomnia Drugs Elevate Risk of Death

Saturday, October 9th, 2010

Note from CCHR: For more on anti-anxiety drugs ( Benzodiazepines commonly known as Xanax, Klonopin, Ativan etc ) including side effects reported to the U.S. FDA, visit our decoded Medwatch reports here: http://www.cchrint.org/psychdrugdangers/medwatch_psych_drug_adverse_reactions.php

(NaturalNews)

If you’ve the habit of popping sleeping pills or tranquilizers like candy, this study could be a life-saving wake-up call for you: Taking sleeping and anxiety-relieving medications significantly elevate your risk of death!

Researchers at Universite Laval, Canada, found that using prescription drugs to treat insomnia and anxiety increases one’s mortality risk by 36 percent, even after controlling for lifestyle behaviors that affect mortality rate, such as alcohol use, smoking, health condition and the level of physical activity.

The conclusion reached by Professor Genevieve Belleville and his team was based on 12 years of records of some 14,000 Canadians from Statistics Canada’s National Population Health Survey. According to the team, the data comes from surveys which were carried out every two years between 1994 and 2007. It contains information on the social demographics, lifestyle and health of participants between the ages of 18 to 102.

The researchers proposed that the side effects caused by sleeping and anti-anxiety medications could be the reasons behind the link. Sleeping pills and anti-anxiety drugs are known to slow reaction time, cause drowsiness, impair thinking and wreck havoc on coordination. These effects would significantly increase one’s chances of meeting with an accident, especially among the elderly.

Statement about the study added that: “They [Sleeping and anti-anxiety medications] may also have an inhibiting effect on the respiratory system, which could aggravate certain breathing problems during sleep. These medications are also central nervous system inhibitors that may affect judgment and thus increase the risk of suicide.”

What isn’t mentioned is that there are also genuine safety concerns related to the use of tranquilizers and sleeping pills. Use them together or mix any of them with alcohol or FDA-approved painkillers can produce serious drug interaction and even cause death. In 2008, a casual combination of anti-anxiety and sleeping drugs ended Australian actor Heath Ledger’s life abruptly. Initially thought to be a case of recreational drug abuse, an autopsy instead found Xanax, Valium, Restoril and other pharmaceuticals commonly used for treating insomnia, anxiety, depression and pain inside Ledger’s body.

Recognizing the real dangers involving sleeping and anti-anxiety drugs, Dr. Belleville warned: “These medications aren’t candy, and taking them is far from harmless. Given that cognitive behavioral therapies have shown good results in treating insomnia and anxiety, doctors should systematically discuss such therapies with their patients as an option.”

Details of the study can be found in the Canadian Journal of Psychiatry.

Sources:

Use of medication for insomnia or anxiety increases mortality risk by 36 percent (http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_relea…)

Benzodiazepine Use and the Risk of Motor Vehicle Crash in the Elderly (http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/conten…)

Benzodiazepine Side Effects (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzod…)

Heath Ledger Cause of Death Confirmed: Prescription Drug Toxicity (http://www.naturalnews.com/022602.html)

Visit NaturalNews.com here http://www.naturalnews.com/029949_insomnia_drugs_death.html

« Return to news items


Share