Why antidepressants are simply a confidence trick: A leading psychologist claims taking sugar pills would work just as well

The Daily Mail
By Professor Irving Kirsch
August 3, 2010

We spend more than £250 m a year on antidepressants in the UK – and it’s a complete waste of money.

They are not much better than sugar pills, they have nasty side – effects, such as sexual dysfunction, and they increase young people’s risk of suicide.

New research shows they don’t even work on the brain in the way we thought they did.

For years we were told depression was caused by low levels of a brain chemical called serotonin, and that antidepressants worked by boosting it.

But an Australian study published in the Archives of General Psychiatry shows that rather than low levels, depressed people might have double the normal amount in some parts of their brains.

Many people were surprised by these new findings, but I wasn’t.

I’ve been studying antidepressants for more than a decade, and I knew that if they worked at all, it wasn’t by changing brain chemistry.

The major reason you feel better when taking an antidepressant – maybe the only reason – is the placebo effect.

When I first published a paper back in 1998 saying that antidepressant drugs such as Prozac and Seroxat were not much better than a placebo, almost everyone thought it couldn’t be true.

There was so much evidence they worked. Thousands of people claimed the drugs had turned their lives round.

My colleagues said that I must have made a mistake: either I had looked at the wrong data, or I hadn’t analysed it properly.

In fact, what I’d done was to look at the research on antidepressants in a different way from everyone else.

Other researchers were concentrating on how much better the drugs were than a placebo.

What I was interested in was finding out how strong the placebo effect was in treating depression.

I compared the placebo effect to having no treatment at all – no one had done that before.

We already knew that placebos could have a powerful effect in conditions such as pain, angina, ulcers and asthma.

Depression was an obvious next step, because when you are depressed you lose hope, and placebos give you hope.

But I was flabbergasted by just how big the placebo effect was.

Read entire article here:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1299791/Why-antidepressants-simply-confidence-trick-A-leading-psychologist-claims-taking-sugar-pills-work-just-well.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

« Return to news items


Share

Related Posts

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010 at 6:00 pm and is filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Leading psychologist says antidepressants no better than placebo—the difference is no suicidal side effects with placebo”

  1. Kathryn says:

    I knew this long ago. In about 1992 i was taking a statistics class (undergrad). We were to correlate two different somethings & i chose 2 SSRIs with the idea that since they were suppose to work similarly, they would have similar side effects. I used the data provided by the manufacturers in their PDR info. I put in the data (early computer) & the two SSRIs did not correlate whatsoever. But just for kicks & to play with the program some, i put in the data for each SSRI & the data for its placebo. The results were nearly perfect linear correlation – which should not be true whatsoever unless the testing was contaminated.

    This didn’t stop me from still continuing to take the stupid SSRIs for another 10 years until i finally woke up to the issue.

    Also, it turns out, i had been misdiagnosed with depression when the true problem was (physically-based) Chronic Fatigue & Immune issues. SSRIs didn’t do anything to help that & actually made me sicker.

Leave a Comment

Read our comment rules before posting your comment.