BBC News
By Philippa Roxby
July 28, 2010

Diagnosing psychiatric illness has always been controversial, mental health experts say. Now some are worried that a new draft of the diagnostic ‘bible’ for mental health medicine could result in almost everyone being diagnosed with a mental condition.

The diagnostic ‘bible’ in question is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, published by the American Psychiatric Association.

The US manual is used worldwide as a basis for diagnosis, research and medical education.

Its forthcoming fifth edition – known in the profession as as DSM-5 – is set to contain a range of new diagnoses, including conditions such as “mixed anxiety depression, psychosis risk syndrome and temper dysregulation disorder”, as well as the more mundane binge eating.

The danger, say experts writing in a special issue of the Journal of Mental Health, is that there has not been enough research to back up these changes.

Even the smallest shift in how to define something like depression could have huge implications.

Self-fulfilling

Dr Felicity Callard, senior research fellow at the Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, says it is crucial to understand what happens when people are over-diagnosed.

“There are very big potential implications on how people, particularly adolescents, respond to being told they have a mental illness. It’s likely there will be harmful consequences,” she said.

She cites the “at risk psychosis syndrome” diagnosis as an example of a label which is given to young people who ‘might’ have psychosis – characterised by abrupt changes in personality. It is a diagnosis of something which could result in a disorder, but only potentially. That can have complicated effects, she says.

“Imagine a young person being told that they are “at risk” of developing a mental illness. How would that affect that individual’s behaviour? Could it lead to increased stigma or even discrimination? And how might it affect the parents and family of that person too?”

Jerome Wakefield of New York University’s Department of Psychiatry writes: “One of the most frightening scenarios is the potential for medicating people – particularly children – who haven’t yet shown any signs of illness in a bid to ‘treat’ them.”

These concerns are shared by a number of clinical experts in the Journal of Mental Health.

Read entire article here:  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-10787342

« Return to news items

News Feed

Related Posts

• British psychiatrists warn APA’s new “mental disorders” will turn large numbers of normal people into psychiatric patients (0)
• The Total Failure of Modern Psychiatry (0)
• DSM: The Book of Woe—Inside the Battle to Define Mental Illness (1)
• Psychiatric Times – Let’s Call the Whole Thing Off (0)
• Natural News: Children’s temper tantrums to be reclassified as mental disorders (3)

Tags: American Psychiatric Association, APA, at risk, binge eating, child drugging, depression, Diagnosing, diagnosis, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders, dsm, DSM-5, Felicity Callard, Institute of Psychiatry at King's College London, Jerome Wakefield, Journal of Mental Health, mental illness, mixed anxiety depression, over-diagnosed, psychiatric bible, psychiatric illness, psychiatry, Psychosis Risk Syndrome, temper dysregulation disorder

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 28th, 2010 at 10:58 am and is filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.